Literature DB >> 3674104

Individual variation and specific cognitive deficits in the fra(X) syndrome.

T M Theobald1, D A Hay, C Judge.   

Abstract

Mental retardation has been associated with fra(X) but comprehensive psychological evaluation has rarely been applied to 2 major behavioral questions 1) the extent of individual variation in IQ among fra(X) males and the possibility of some fra(X) males being of normal IQ; and 2) whether there is a depression in general IQ or whether specific abilities are impaired. The problems of developing an effective battery of tests for assessing fra(X) are discussed. These questions were examined in 54 individuals, comprising fra(X) males, their obligate carrier mothers and those sisters shown to have the fra(X). Among noninstitutionalised males nonverbal IQ as measured on a Block Design test ranged from 100 to 0, and vocabulary scores while generally higher, ranged from 79-33. The males scored low on a digit span memory task, while performance on a memory of objects task was adequate. Despite lower overall scores, a similar pattern and variability emerged in institutionalised males. Daughters were extremely variable in performance and the mothers performed much better, supporting the view that women who have children are a selected subset of fra(X) syndrome individuals. The performance of one male is discussed in detail. His vocabulary and nonverbal IQ scores were normal, despite his having other specific cognitive deficits. The pattern of abilities and behavior seen in fra(X) may result in an overestimation of intelligence and underestimation of penetrance when based on clinical impressions rather than formal psychological assessment. The implications of this for molecular and for population genetic approaches to fra(X) are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3674104     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320280102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  9 in total

1.  Clinical features and reproductive patterns in fragile X female heterozygotes.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; D A Hay
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Between-generation differences in ascertainment and penetrance: relevance to genetic hypotheses in fragile X.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; L J Sheffield; D A Hay
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Using perceptual signatures to define and dissociate condition-specific neural etiology: autism and fragile X syndrome as model conditions.

Authors:  Armando Bertone; Julie Hanck; Cary Kogan; Avi Chaudhuri; Kim Cornish
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2010-12

4.  Chronological age, but not FMRP levels, predicts neuropsychological performance in girls with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Amy A Lightbody; Scott S Hall; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 3.568

5.  Neurobehavioral effects of the fragile X premutation in adult women: a controlled study.

Authors:  A L Reiss; L Freund; M T Abrams; C Boehm; H Kazazian
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Genotype-phenotype relationships in fragile X syndrome: a family study.

Authors:  D Z Loesch; R Huggins; D A Hay; A K Gedeon; J C Mulley; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Neuroanatomy in fragile X females: the posterior fossa.

Authors:  A L Reiss; L Freund; J E Tseng; P K Joshi
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Autism: the point of view from fragile X studies.

Authors:  C Feinstein; A L Reiss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1998-10

9.  FRAXE and mental retardation.

Authors:  J C Mulley; S Yu; D Z Loesch; D A Hay; A Donnelly; A K Gedeon; P Carbonell; I López; G Glover; I Gabarrón
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.318

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.