Literature DB >> 3671034

Use of central and peripheral optical flow in stance and locomotion in young walkers.

T A Stoffregen1, M A Schmuckler, E J Gibson.   

Abstract

Young walkers (up to 5 years of age) were presented with optical flow in a moving room. Flow was global or was restricted to either the center or the periphery of the visible optic array. On standing trials the response rate was greatest when peripheral flow was available. The availability of central flow had a smaller effect on standing, and the younger children showed greater response rates to frontal flow than did the older ones. There was a strong negative correlation between age and response rate for all conditions. Flow also affected stability during locomotion. Response rate was again related to the location of the available flow. It is concluded that children show the same relative sensitivity for flow in the periphery of the dynamic structure of the optic array as has been observed in adults, but that this differentiation of different areas of optical structure is not yet fully developed when children learn to stand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3671034     DOI: 10.1068/p160113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  24 in total

1.  The visual control of stability in children and adults: postural readjustments in a ground optical flow.

Authors:  Bernard Baumberger; Brice Isableu; Michelangelo Flückiger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The influence of dynamic visual cues for postural control in children aged 7-12 years.

Authors:  Patrick J Sparto; Mark S Redfern; Jeff G Jasko; Margaretha L Casselbrant; Ellen M Mandel; Joseph M Furman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The temporal organization of posture changes during the first year of independent walking.

Authors:  J S Metcalfe; L-C Chen; T-Y Chang; K McDowell; J J Jeka; J E Clark
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Postural control in strabismic children versus non strabismic age-matched children.

Authors:  Cynthia Lions; Emmanuel Bui-Quoc; Maria Pia Bucci
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Spatiotemporal boundaries of linear vection.

Authors:  X M Sauvan; C Bonnet
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

6.  Toward Improving the Mobility of Patients with Peripheral Visual Field Defects with Novel Digital Spectacles.

Authors:  Ahmed M Sayed; Rashed Kashem; Mostafa Abdel-Mottaleb; Vatookarn Roongpoovapatr; Taher K Eleiwa; Mohamed Abdel-Mottaleb; Richard K Parrish; Mohamed Abou Shousha
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Postural control in children. Coupling to dynamic somatosensory information.

Authors:  José A Barela; John J Jeka; Jane E Clark
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Postural strategies and sensory integration: no turning point between childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Sophie Mallau; Marianne Vaugoyeau; Christine Assaiante
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of visual deprivation on intra-limb coordination during walking in children and adults.

Authors:  Ann Hallemans; Peter Aerts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The organization of exploratory behaviors in infant locomotor planning.

Authors:  Kari S Kretch; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2016-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.