Literature DB >> 3668112

Predictors of outcome for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction: a change in the measuring stick.

B A Carabello1, B W Usher, G H Hendrix, M E Assey, F A Crawford, R B Leman.   

Abstract

Although left ventricular function is generally regarded as a key determinant of prognosis in aortic regurgitation, predictors of outcome of aortic valve replacement based on this factor have recently been questioned. This study was performed to examine the role of indexes of left ventricular function in predicting the outcome of surgery in patients with aortic regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction. Fourteen patients with aortic regurgitation with a preoperative ejection fraction of less than 0.55 (average 0.45 +/- 0.02) who underwent aortic valve replacement were studied. The patients had 82 (58%) of a possible 140 predictors of negative outcome preoperatively, but 12 of the 14 patients had a decrease in symptoms and an increase in ejection fraction into the normal range after operation (average postoperative ejection fraction 0.59 +/- 0.04). Although improvement occurred despite the presence of many negative predictors of outcome, there was a significant correlation between postoperative ejection fraction and eight of the tested preoperative predictors. Preoperative end-systolic dimension correlated best (r = -0.91) with postoperative ejection fraction. An end-systolic dimension of 60 mm correlated with a postoperative ejection fraction of 0.55. The results indicate that preoperative ventricular function is still an important determinant of outcome of aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation. However, current medical and surgical techniques permit a better prognosis in the presence of reduced ventricular function than was previously considered possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3668112     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80335-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  7 in total

1.  Aortic Regurgitation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-04

2.  Decision making in the management of asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation: a cardiologist's perspective.

Authors:  C M Otto
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  SPECT radionuclide angiography: it is time for a consensus statement.

Authors:  Doumit Daou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Influence of left ventricular relaxation on the pressure half time of aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  S F de Marchi; S Windecker; B C Aeschbacher; C Seiler
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of equilibrium electrocardiography-gated SPECT radionuclide angiography versus planar radionuclide angiography for the quantification of global left ventricular function.

Authors:  Doumit Daou; Carlos Coaguila; Abdel Benada
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Left ventricular dynamics after aortic valve replacement: a long-term, combined radionuclide angiographic and ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  C S Masotti; P Bonfranceschi; G Rusticali; F Rusticali; A Pierangeli
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1992

7.  Left ventricular performance after aortic valve replacement in patients with low ejection fraction.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Tanoue; Yasuhisa Oishi; Hiromichi Sonoda; Takahiro Nishida; Atsuhiro Nakashima; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 1.731

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.