Literature DB >> 3668109

Mexiletine-quinidine combination: electrophysiologic correlates of a favorable antiarrhythmic interaction in humans.

H J Duff1, L B Mitchell, D Manyari, D G Wyse.   

Abstract

Combination therapy with mexiletine and quinidine has been shown to be more effective than either agent alone. The ability of mexiletine monotherapy, quinidine monotherapy and mexiletine-quinidine combination therapy to suppress inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia was related to drug-induced changes in ventricular refractoriness, conduction times and monophasic action potential duration recorded from both ventricles. Ventricular tachycardia could no longer be induced in 7 (35%) of the 20 patients studied with combination therapy. This was a significantly higher proportion of patients than that of the groups responding to either monotherapy (quinidine, 10%; mexiletine, 5%). Ventricular effective and functional refractory periods were measured when applying single (S2), double (S3) and triple (S4) extrastimuli. Quinidine monotherapy increased functional and effective refractory periods of both single and multiple extrastimuli. However, when comparing measurements made during mexiletine treatment with those at baseline, mexiletine monotherapy increased only the refractory periods of S4. The effective refractory period of S4 during mexiletine monotherapy (200 +/- 20 ms) was significantly longer than at baseline (160 +/- 21 ms). Similarly, when comparing measurements made during combination therapy with those during quinidine monotherapy, combination therapy significantly increased the refractory periods only of multiple extrastimuli. The effective refractory period of S4 during combination therapy (253 +/- 26 ms) was significantly longer than that of quinidine monotherapy (223 +/- 27 ms).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3668109     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80360-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

Review 1.  Mexiletine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of arrhythmias.

Authors:  J P Monk; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Illustrative and historic cases of phenoconversion.

Authors:  Veronique Michaud; Pamela Dow; Jacques Turgeon
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Late sodium current block for drug-induced long QT syndrome: Results from a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  L Johannesen; J Vicente; J W Mason; C Erato; C Sanabria; K Waite-Labott; M Hong; J Lin; P Guo; A Mutlib; J Wang; W J Crumb; K Blinova; D Chan; J Stohlman; J Florian; M Ugander; N Stockbridge; D G Strauss
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Effects of combined use of class I antiarrhythmic agents on Vmax of guinea-pig ventricular muscles.

Authors:  J Toyama; T Kawamura; I Kodama
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.727

5.  Adult Human Primary Cardiomyocyte-Based Model for the Simultaneous Prediction of Drug-Induced Inotropic and Pro-arrhythmia Risk.

Authors:  Nathalie Nguyen; William Nguyen; Brynna Nguyenton; Phachareeya Ratchada; Guy Page; Paul E Miller; Andre Ghetti; Najah Abi-Gerges
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Uncertainty Quantification Reveals the Importance of Data Variability and Experimental Design Considerations for in Silico Proarrhythmia Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Kelly C Chang; Sara Dutta; Gary R Mirams; Kylie A Beattie; Jiansong Sheng; Phu N Tran; Min Wu; Wendy W Wu; Thomas Colatsky; David G Strauss; Zhihua Li
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  Mechanistic Model-Informed Proarrhythmic Risk Assessment of Drugs: Review of the "CiPA" Initiative and Design of a Prospective Clinical Validation Study.

Authors:  Jose Vicente; Robbert Zusterzeel; Lars Johannesen; Jay Mason; Philip Sager; Vikram Patel; Murali K Matta; Zhihua Li; Jiang Liu; Christine Garnett; Norman Stockbridge; Issam Zineh; David G Strauss
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Assessment of Multi-Ion Channel Block in a Phase I Randomized Study Design: Results of the CiPA Phase I ECG Biomarker Validation Study.

Authors:  Jose Vicente; Robbert Zusterzeel; Lars Johannesen; Roberto Ochoa-Jimenez; Jay W Mason; Carlos Sanabria; Sarah Kemp; Philip T Sager; Vikram Patel; Murali K Matta; Jiang Liu; Jeffry Florian; Christine Garnett; Norman Stockbridge; David G Strauss
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 6.875

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.