Literature DB >> 3667643

Multiple revisions for failed total hip arthroplasty not associated with infection.

B F Kavanagh1, R H Fitzgerald.   

Abstract

Forty-five patients (forty-five hips) underwent repeat revisions of a total hip arthroplasty that had failed but was not associated with infection; seven of these patients had a third revision. The mean length of follow-up was approximately three years, and no patients were lost to follow-up. Twenty-eight of the forty-five patients had no or slight pain after the second revision, and thirty reported that their condition was improved. After the third revision, six patients had no or only slight pain, and five said that their condition was improved. On final roentgenographic examination, there was probable loosening (migration or subsidence of a component, lucency at the prosthesis-cement interface, fracture of the cement, or complete radiolucency at the bone-cement, or complete radiolucency at the bone-cement interface of more than one millimeter in at least one zone) of eight of the acetabular components and thirteen of the femoral components after the second revision and three acetabular components and one femoral component after the third. There was symptomatic loosening (moderate or severe pain and probable roentgenographic loosening) in six patients after the second revision and one after the third. Significant postoperative complications were noted in nineteen of the forty-five patients, and treatment was considered to be a failure in eleven hips after the second revision and in two after the third.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3667643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  [Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].

Authors:  M Hoberg; B M Holzapfel; A F Steinert; F Kratzer; M Walcher; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

Authors:  G A Ahmed; B Ishaque; M Rickert; C Fölsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The unstable total hip replacement.

Authors:  F D'Angelo; L Murena; G Zatti; P Cherubino
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saqeb B Mirza; Douglas G Dunlop; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Syed G Naqvi; Shafat Gangoo; Saif Salih
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-05-11

5.  High medium-term survival of Zweymüller SLR-plus stem used in femoral revision.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  ACETABULAR RECONSTRUCTION IN PAPROSKY TYPE III DEFECTS.

Authors:  Jaime J Morales De Cano; Llorenç Guillamet; Arturo Perez Pons
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  Dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: Are we safe?

Authors:  Tom Schmidt-Braekling; Dorothee Sieber; Georg Gosheger; Jan C Theil; Burkhard Moellenbeck; Dimosthenis Andreou; Ralf Dieckmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A prospective study of hip revision surgery using the Exeter long-stem prosthesis: function, subsidence, and complications for 57 patients.

Authors:  K Randhawa; F S Hossain; B Smith; Cyril Mauffrey; T Lawrence
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-10-24

9.  Use of a Constrained Acetabular Liner to Prevent and Treat Recurrent Dislocation after Total Hip Replacement Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joo Hyoun Song; Won Hwan Kwon; Seung-Bae Oh; Kyoung Ho Moon
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 2.071

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.