Literature DB >> 3664913

A comparison of two types of epidural catheters.

S H Rolbin1, E Hew, G Ogilvie.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare two epidural catheters--the Portex epidural catheter and Vas-Cath catheter. One hundred and fifty patients in labour who received epidural anaesthesia were selected and either one or the other catheter was used, based on random assignment. Ease of insertion, maintenance and removal of the catheter were assessed, as was the incidence of blood return and paraesthesiae during epidural catheter insertion. There were no significant differences between the catheters as far as insertion, maintenance and removal were concerned. However, the incidence of paresthesiae was 44 per cent with the Portex and 24 per cent with Vas-Cath catheters (p less than 0.008). The incidence of blood vessel trauma was 12 per cent with the Portex and 6.7 per cent with the Vas-Cath catheter (p = NS). Choice of epidural catheter is a factor to be considered in minimizing the incidence of blood vessel trauma or paresthesiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3664913     DOI: 10.1007/BF03014349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  6 in total

1.  Hyperventilation does not affect the incidence of paresthesiae and blood vessel cannulation during epidural catheter insertion.

Authors:  S H Rolbin; A Relle; E M Hew
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1985-09

2.  Supraclavicular subcutaneous emphysema following lumbar epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  E N Laman; C H McLeskey
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  Neurologic deficits following epidural or spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  R E Kane
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Paraplegia following epidural analgesia.

Authors:  N C Ballin
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Vessel puncture with epidural catheters. Experience in obstetric patients.

Authors:  A J Verniquet
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1980-07-07       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Incidence of venous air embolism during epidural catheter insertion.

Authors:  J S Naulty; G W Ostheimer; S Datta; R Knapp; J B Weiss
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.892

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Fluid through the epidural needle does not reduce complications of epidural catheter insertion.

Authors:  S H Rolbin; S H Halpern; B M Braude; D Kapala; R Unger; S Radhakrisnan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  The epidural test dose in obstetrics: is it necessary?

Authors:  S L Dain; S H Rolbin; E M Hew
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Direction of catheter insertion and the incidence of paresthesia during continuous epidural anesthesia in the elderly patients.

Authors:  Jong-Hak Kim; Jun Seop Lee; Dong Yeon Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-05-24

4.  Lateral deviation of four types of epidural catheters from the lumbar epidural space into the intervertebral foramen.

Authors:  Tetsuya Uchino; Masahiro Miura; Yoshimasa Oyama; Shigekiyo Matsumoto; Chihiro Shingu; Takaaki Kitano
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.078

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.