Literature DB >> 3664242

Evaluating surgical risk: the importance of technical factors in determining outcome.

R A Pettigrew1, H J Burns, D C Carter.   

Abstract

A total of 113 patients having elective resection of the alimentary tract were studied prospectively to examine the relationship of pre-operative clinical and nutritional assessment to the development of major postoperative complications. In addition, the operating surgeon made a risk assessment on a linear analogue scale before and immediately after operation. Major complications developed in 28 patients (25 per cent). Age, weight loss and relative weight did not select high risk patients, but patients with a serum albumin of 29 g/l developed significantly more complications than those with higher levels (60 versus 22 per cent, P less than 0.05). Clinical assessment also selected some high risk patients but patients selected by the surgeon's pre-operative assessment did not develop significantly more complications than those not selected (38 versus 21 per cent). However, the surgeon's postoperative assessment did select patients at significantly increased risk, especially when compared with his pre-operative assessment. Of 38 patients who were selected pre-operatively as high risk or who increased their risk ranking postoperatively, 20 (53 per cent) developed complications, as opposed to only 6 of 65 patients (9 per cent) who were low risk or decreased their risk ranking (P less than 0.001). The surgeons changed their ranking postoperatively in 44 patients and in 36 (82 per cent) the reason given was the technical ease or difficulty of the procedure. Using receiver-operating characteristic curves, immediate postoperative assessment was superior to any pre-operative method of selecting high risk patients. Of 15 patients with normal serum albumin levels whose risk ranking increased postoperatively 6 (40 per cent) developed complications while none of the 7 patients with low serum albumin (high risk) who decreased their risk ranking developed complications. It is concluded that operative performance is the main factor in the development of postoperative complications and should be assessed in future studies of outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3664242     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800740912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Polypharmacy in a general surgical unit and consequences of drug withdrawal.

Authors:  J M Kennedy; A M van Rij; G F Spears; R A Pettigrew; I G Tucker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Starting laparoscopic cholecystectomy--the pig as a training model.

Authors:  W O Kirwan; T K Kaar; R Waldron
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  A Karliczek; N J Harlaar; C J Zeebregts; T Wiggers; P C Baas; G M van Dam
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Mechanisms of decision-making in preoperative assessment for older adult prostate cancer patients-A qualitative study.

Authors:  Patrick Kierkegaard; Mira D Vale; Spencer Garrison; Brent K Hollenbeck; John M Hollingsworth; Jason Owen-Smith
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Anastomotic leakage after resection and bypass for esophageal cancer: lessons learned from the past.

Authors:  T Lorentz; M Fok; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Predicting morbidity of liver resection.

Authors:  Sudharsan Madhavan; Vishal G Shelat; Su-Lin Soong; Winston W L Woon; Terence Huey; Yiong H Chan; Sameer P Junnarkar
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Association of Frailty With Failure to Rescue After Low-Risk and High-Risk Inpatient Surgery.

Authors:  Rupen Shah; Kristopher Attwood; Shipra Arya; Daniel E Hall; Jason M Johanning; Emmanuel Gabriel; Anthony Visioni; Steven Nurkin; Moshim Kukar; Steven Hochwald; Nader N Massarweh
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 9.  Proposed definitions for diagnosis, severity scoring, stratification, and outcome for trials on intraabdominal infection. Joint Working Party of SIS North America and Europe.

Authors:  P O Nyström; R Bax; E P Dellinger; L Dominioni; W A Knaus; J L Meakins; C Ohmann; J S Solomkin; H Wacha; D H Wittmann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Underweight patients and the risks of major surgery.

Authors:  J A Windsor
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.