Literature DB >> 3662764

Review of proficiency testing performance of laboratories accredited by the College of American Pathologists.

G A Hoeltge1, J K Duckworth.   

Abstract

The Commission on Laboratory Accreditation of the College of American Pathologists (CAP), Skokie, III, monitors the proficiency testing of accredited laboratories by regular review of the Cumulative Survey Management Report. Analytes are targeted for review on the basis of repeated "unacceptable" results in the CAP Survey Program. Approximately 1% of proficiency testing results are repeatedly graded unfavorably. Directors of 271 Great Lakes Region laboratories reported the causes of and the corrective actions taken for 583 targeted results over a two-year period. Targetting of results in 31% was attributed to methodologic or instrumentation problems, 19% to technical performance factors, and 27% to clerical errors. Only 3% were ascribed to the Survey materials or to the criteria used for grading, and 20% of the problems remained unexplained after investigation. There was improvement in 496 (88%) of 583 targeted. During the study period, results from 96% of laboratories showed improved performance for all or a majority of the targeted analytes.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3662764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  2 in total

Review 1.  Sense and nonsense in the process of accreditation of a pathology laboratory.

Authors:  Elodie Long-Mira; Kevin Washetine; Paul Hofman
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Validation and quality control of protein microarray-based analytical methods.

Authors:  Larry J Kricka; Stephen R Master
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.695

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.