Literature DB >> 3661436

Detection of caval obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging after intraatrial repair of transposition of the great arteries.

R M Campbell1, G A Moreau, J A Johns, J D Burger, M Mazer, T P Graham, M V Kulkarni.   

Abstract

Vena caval obstruction may cause significant morbidity after intraatrial repair of transposition of the great arteries (TGA). Two noninvasive methods of diagnosing vena caval obstruction were compared with cardiac catheterization. Echocardiographically gated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and echocardiographic evaluation (2-dimensional saline contrast echocardiography and pulsed Doppler flow measurement) were performed on 15 patients 0.7 to 13.5 years after intraatrial repair of TGA (8 Mustard, 7 Senning). At catheterization, complete superior vena cava or partial caval obstruction (gradient greater than 5 mm Hg from cava to systemic venous atrium) was present in 7 of 15 patients. Superior vena cava obstruction was directly visualized by MRI in both patients with catheterization-proved complete superior vena cava occlusion. A dilated azygous/hemiazygous venous complex (greater than or equal to 5 mm cross-sectional diameter) was seen by MRI in 5 of 7 patients with complex or partial vena caval obstruction and in no patient without vena caval obstruction. MRI showed superior vena caval dilatation (ratio of superior vena caval diameter to aortic diameter greater than 1.45) in 3 of 5 patients with partial vena caval obstruction and in 0 of 8 without vena caval obstruction. Direct visualization of narrowing within the atrium was unreliable for any MRI plane because of the 3-dimensional nature of the intraatrial baffle. Two-dimensional saline contrast echocardiography, successfully performed in 12 of 15 patients, detected complete superior vena caval obstruction only in the 2 patients with catheterization-proved complete superior vena cava occlusion. Contrast echocardiography failed to identify any of the 5 patients with partial vena caval obstruction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3661436     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90383-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Sara L Partington; Anne Marie Valente
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

2.  Assessment of right ventricular volumes and function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance cine imaging after atrial redirection surgery for complete transposition of the great arteries.

Authors:  Laura Jimenez-Juan; Subodh B Joshi; Bernd J Wintersperger; Andrew T Yan; Sebastian Ley; Andrew M Crean; Elsie T Nguyen; Djeven P Deva; Narinder S Paul; Rachel M Wald
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Society of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Society for Pediatric Radiology/North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the Use of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Pediatric Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: Endorsed by The American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mark A Fogel; Shaftkat Anwar; Craig Broberg; Lorna Browne; Taylor Chung; Tiffanie Johnson; Vivek Muthurangu; Michael Taylor; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Carolyn Wilhelm
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 8.589

Review 4.  Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Society of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Society for Pediatric Radiology/North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pediatric congenital and acquired heart disease : Endorsed by The American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mark A Fogel; Shaftkat Anwar; Craig Broberg; Lorna Browne; Taylor Chung; Tiffanie Johnson; Vivek Muthurangu; Michael Taylor; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Carolyn Wilhelm
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.903

5.  Quantitative MRI comparison of systemic hemodynamics in Mustard/Senning repaired patients and healthy volunteers at rest.

Authors:  Eric Laffon; Maria Jimenez; Valérie Latrabe; Dominique Ducassou; Alain Choussat; Roger Marthan; François Laurent
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.