Literature DB >> 3660657

Perceptual "blankout" of monocular homogeneous fields (Ganzfelder) is prevented with binocular viewing.

S J Bolanowski1, R W Doty.   

Abstract

The loss of visual perception or "blankout" which occurs when a homogeneous field (Ganzfeld) is presented monocularly is prevented when the same field is viewed binocularly. Thus, blankout cannot be retinal; and contours or transients in time and space are unnecessary for the continuous maintenance of visual perception. Experiments are reported in which blankout ensues only if the two eyes receive luminance disparities ca 0.75 log I. Furthermore, blankout is only marginally affected by stimulus intensity, nor is it dependent on stimulus hue. However, equally luminant but disparate hues presented to the two eyes produce perceptions reminiscent of blankout, with the darkness of blankout replaced with that of color. It is hypothesized that the underlying mechanisms have a commonality in the phenomena of blankout and binocular rivalry but several noncongruent features require explanation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3660657     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90012-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey matrix perimeter.

Authors:  Andrew John Anderson; Chris A Johnson; Murray Fingeret; John L Keltner; Paul G D Spry; Michael Wall; John S Werner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Baseline alterations in blue-on-yellow normal perimetric sensitivity.

Authors:  J M Wild; I D Moss
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Melanopsin-driven increases in maintained activity enhance thalamic visual response reliability across a simulated dawn.

Authors:  Riccardo Storchi; Nina Milosavljevic; Cyril G Eleftheriou; Franck P Martial; Patrycja Orlowska-Feuer; Robert A Bedford; Timothy M Brown; Marcelo A Montemurro; Rasmus S Petersen; Robert J Lucas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How patterns of bleached rods and cones become visual perceptual experiences: a proposal.

Authors:  R Galambos; G Juhász
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A limited role for suppression in the central field of individuals with strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Gurvinder K Panesar; Andrew J Scally; Ian E Pacey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Variability in monocular and binocular fixation during standard automated perimetry.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Kaoru Kobayashi; Asuka Shibamoto; Houmi Tobari; Yuki Fukuda; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of monocular sensitivities measured with and without occlusion using the head-mounted perimeter imo.

Authors:  Akemi Wakayama; Chota Matsumoto; Yoriko Ayato; Yoshikazu Shimomura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of central visual sensitivity between monocular and binocular testing in advanced glaucoma patients using imo perimetry.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kumagai; Takuhei Shoji; Yuji Yoshikawa; Izumi Mine; Junji Kanno; Hirokazu Ishii; Akane Saito; Sho Ishikawa; Itaru Kimura; Kei Shinoda
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Effect of Sensitivity Disparity Between the Two Eyes on Pointwise Monocular Sensitivity Under Binocular Viewing in Patients With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Akemi Wakayama; Hiroki Nomoto; Yasutaka Chiba; Chota Matsumoto; Shunji Kusaka
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.