Literature DB >> 3660620

Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision.

D M Levi1, S A Klein, Y L Yap.   

Abstract

Three experiments were performed to examine positional acuity and the role of spatial sampling in central, peripheral and amblyopic vision. In the first experiment, 3-line bisection acuity was compared to grating acuity. In normal foveal vision bisection acuity represents a hyperacuity. In anisometropic amblyopes, bisection acuity is reduced in rough proportion to their grating acuity. In strabismic amblyopes, and in the normal periphery, bisection acuity is reduced to a greater extent than grating acuity. This result implies that reduced contrast sensitivity of the spatial filters is not sufficient to account for the increased positional uncertainty found in peripheral vision and in strabismic amblyopia. In order to test the hypothesis that the high degree of positional uncertainty evident in these visual systems is a consequence of sparse spatial sampling, bisection thresholds and width discrimination thresholds were measured with stimuli comprised of discrete samples. The results showed that normal foveal vision and the vision of anisometropic amblyopes show little benefit from adding discrete samples to the stimulus. In contrast, the normal periphery, and the central field of strabismic amblyopes demonstrate marked positional uncertainty which can be efficiently reduced in proportion to the square root of the number of samples (up to about 10) comprising the stimulus in the direction orthogonal to the discrimination cue. In aggregate the results suggest that anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia are fundamentally different. The positional uncertainty in anisometropic amblyopia is consistent with the reduced sensitivity of the spatial filters. The data of the normal periphery and of the central field of strabismic amblyopes suggest that the cortical sampling grain imposes a fundamental limit upon their positional acuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3660620     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90044-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  32 in total

1.  Classification images with uncertainty.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Anirvan S Nandy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images.

Authors:  Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Scale-dependent loss of global form perception in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Rislove; Elaine C Hall; Kara A Stavros; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Comparison of line and space bisection in evaluation of normal and amblyopic spatial vision.

Authors:  S E Graefe; W Haase
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Early monocular defocus disrupts the normal development of receptive-field structure in V2 neurons of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Tao; Bin Zhang; Guofu Shen; Janice Wensveen; Earl L Smith; Shinji Nishimoto; Izumi Ohzawa; Yuzo M Chino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Infants' visual system nonretinotopically integrates color signals along a motion trajectory.

Authors:  Jiale Yang; Junji Watanabe; So Kanazawa; Shin'ya Nishida; Masami K Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Efficient integration across spatial frequencies for letter identification in foveal and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Deficits of spatial localization in children with strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Maria Fronius; Ruxandra Sireteanu; Alina Zubcov
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Visuospatial interpolation in typically developing children and in people with Williams Syndrome.

Authors:  Melanie Palomares; Barbara Landau; Howard Egeth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Sensitivity to synchronicity of biological motion in normal and amblyopic vision.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Luu; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.