Literature DB >> 3656551

Formation of encrustations on indwelling urinary catheters in the elderly: a comparison of different types of catheter materials in "blockers" and "nonblockers".

C M Kunin1, Q F Chin, S Chambers.   

Abstract

In order to determine the effect of catheter materials on formation of encrustations in long-term indwelling urinary catheters in the elderly we performed a crossover study utilizing commercially available silicone, silicone-coated, teflon-coated and latex catheters that were left in place for 14 days. The study was conducted with #18 french catheters fitted with a 30 ml. balloon since smaller size catheters frequently fell out spontaneously. The distinction between patients who were "blockers" and "nonblockers" was found to be clinically useful since "nonblockers", who constituted about half the population, did well regardless of type of catheter material used. Formation of encrustations and blockage was significantly less in "blockers" with silicone than with teflon-coated or latex catheters. The more rapid flow-time through silicone catheters appears to be related to a larger bore. Although this study supports the use of silicone catheters for "blockers" on long-term drainage the results should not be interpreted to imply that they are preferable to other types of catheters for short-term use or to changing less expensive catheters more frequently when needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3656551     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43412-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Why are Foley catheters so vulnerable to encrustation and blockage by crystalline bacterial biofilm?

Authors:  David Stickler; Robert Young; Gwennan Jones; Nora Sabbuba; Nicola Morris
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-07-11

2.  Bacterial biofilms and catheters: A key to understanding bacterial strategies in catheter-associated urinary tract infection.

Authors:  J C Nickel; J W Costerton
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-09

Review 3.  Encrustation of biomaterials in the urinary tract.

Authors:  Greg L Shaw; Simon K Choong; Christopher Fry
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2004-12-22

Review 4.  The role of biofilm infection in urology.

Authors:  P Tenke; B Kovacs; M Jäckel; E Nagy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Studies on the formation of crystalline bacterial biofilms on urethral catheters.

Authors:  D Stickler; N Morris; M C Moreno; N Sabbuba
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Treatment of a patient with total urinary calculi: a case report.

Authors:  Jiajia Ma; Xuebao Zhang; Jipeng Wang; Zhongbao Zhou; Chunhua Lin
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

Review 7.  Catheter-related urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Lindsay E Nicolle
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Proteus mirabilis biofilms and the encrustation of urethral catheters.

Authors:  D Stickler; L Ganderton; J King; J Nettleton; C Winters
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1993

9.  Urethral obstruction of 6 hours or less causes bacteriuria, bacteremia, and pyelonephritis in mice challenged with "nonuropathogenic" Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D E Johnson; R G Russell; C V Lockatell; J C Zulty; J W Warren
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 10.  Urinary infection in the 1990's: the state of the art.

Authors:  W Brumfitt; J M Hamilton-Miller
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.