Literature DB >> 3654420

Neuromuscular and mechanical responses to inspiratory resistive loading during sleep.

D W Hudgel1, M Mulholland, C Hendricks.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were 1) to characterize the immediate inspiratory muscle and ventilation responses to inspiratory resistive loading during sleep in humans and 2) to determine whether upper airway caliber was compromised in the presence of a resistive load. Ventilation variables, chest wall, and upper airway inspiratory muscle electromyograms (EMG), and upper airway resistance were measured for two breaths immediately preceding and immediately following six applications of an inspiratory resistive load of 15 cmH2O.l-1 X s during wakefulness and stage 2 sleep. During wakefulness, chest wall inspiratory peak EMG activity increased 40 +/- 15% (SE), and inspiratory time increased 20 +/- 5%. Therefore, the rate of rise of chest wall EMG increased 14 +/- 10.9% (NS). Upper airway inspiratory muscle activity changed in an inconsistent fashion with application of the load. Tidal volume decreased 16 +/- 6%, and upper airway resistance increased 141 +/- 23% above pre-load levels. During sleep, there was no significant chest wall or upper airway inspiratory muscle or timing responses to loading. Tidal volume decreased 40 +/- 7% and upper airway resistance increased 188 +/- 52%, changes greater than those observed during wakefulness. We conclude that 1) the immediate inspiratory muscle and timing responses observed during inspiratory resistive loading in wakefulness were absent during sleep, 2) there was inadequate activation of upper airway inspiratory muscle activity to compensate for the increased upper airway inspiratory subatmospheric pressure present during loading, and 3) the alteration in upper airway mechanics during resistive loading was greater during sleep than wakefulness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3654420     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1987.63.2.603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  14 in total

1.  The respiratory response to inspiratory resistive loading during rapid eye movement sleep in humans.

Authors:  M J Morrell; H A Browne; L Adams
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Genioglossal inspiratory activation: central respiratory vs mechanoreceptive influences.

Authors:  G Pillar; R B Fogel; A Malhotra; J Beauregard; J K Edwards; S A Shea; D P White
Journal:  Respir Physiol       Date:  2001-08

3.  Short-term potentiation in the control of pharyngeal muscles in obstructive apnea patients.

Authors:  Magdy Younes; Andrea Loewen; Michele Ostrowski; Patrick Hanly
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Waking genioglossal electromyogram in sleep apnea patients versus normal controls (a neuromuscular compensatory mechanism).

Authors:  W S Mezzanotte; D J Tangel; D P White
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  New insights into the timing and potential mechanisms of respiratory-induced cortical arousals in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Jason Amatoury; Amy S Jordan; Barbara Toson; Chinh Nguyen; Andrew Wellman; Danny J Eckert
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 6.  Sleep-related breathing disorders. 7. Sleep and breathing problems in general medicine.

Authors:  P M Calverley
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 7.  Flow-regulatory function of upper airway in health and disease: a unified pathogenetic view of sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  S S Park
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.584

8.  Sleep effects on breathing and respiratory diseases.

Authors:  Sumer S Choudhary; Sanjiw R Choudhary
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2009-10

9.  The effect of sleep on reflex genioglossus muscle activation by stimuli of negative airway pressure in humans.

Authors:  R L Horner; J A Innes; M J Morrell; S A Shea; A Guz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Systemic vs. central administration of common hypnotics reveals opposing effects on genioglossus muscle activity in rats.

Authors:  Eileen Park; Magdy Younes; Hattie Liu; Xia Liu; Richard L Horner
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.