Literature DB >> 3653971

Consequences of worksite hypertension screening. Changes in absenteeism.

P Rudd1, M G Price, L E Graham, B A Beilstein, S J Tarbell, P Bacchetti, S P Fortmann.   

Abstract

To confirm reports of increased absenteeism after worksite hypertension screening, we performed a three-stage blood pressure screening among 5888 self-selected heterogeneous workers at 11 electronics plants using standardized screening and labeling procedures. A total of 296 subjects with mean systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or greater or diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or greater on all three occasions were considered to have sustained hypertension. From the untreated normotensive subjects matched for eight sociodemographic and occupational variables, we prospectively selected one to three controls for each sustained hypertensive subject. Uncorrected absenteeism rates for sustained hypertensive subjects increased 22% from baseline in the postscreening year. Correction by logarithmic transformation for skewed distributions and by rates for matched controls for temporal trends reduced these changes to statistical insignificance with high statistical power. Several subgroups exhibited trends to increased absenteeism. At 12-month follow-up, the blood pressure of the sustained hypertensive subjects showed mean decreases of 12.6/6.7 mm Hg (p less than 0.0001) after the majority had received pharmacological antihypertensive treatment. These results suggest that worksite hypertension screening and labeling produce insignificant absenteeism change overall among self-selected heterogeneous work force populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3653971     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.10.4.425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  9 in total

1.  Labeling and hypertension: it is time to intervene on its negative consequences.

Authors:  Gbenga Ogedegbe
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Hypertension and sickness absence: the role of perceived symptoms.

Authors:  S Melamed; P Froom; M S Green
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1997-10

3.  Job absenteeism and arterial hypertension: results of a hypertension control program.

Authors:  S Ruiz de la Fuente Tirado; P Cortina Greus; J L Alfonso Sanchez; C Saiz Sanchez; A Sabater Pons; J I Gonzalez Arraez; C Cortes Vizcaino
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  [Socioeconomic and quality of life repercussions of arterial hypertension].

Authors:  B Selke; P Marquis; T Lebrun
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  The effect of diagnosing Alzheimer's disease on frequency of physician visits: a case-control study.

Authors:  W C McCormick; W A Kukull; G van Belle; J D Bowen; L Teri; E B Larson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Now we are sick: labeling and hypertension.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  Emotional impact of screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruth E Collins; Laureen M Lopez; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The impact of antihypertensive treatment initiation on health-related quality of life and cardiovascular risk factor levels: a prospective, interventional study.

Authors:  Aapo Tahkola; Päivi Korhonen; Hannu Kautiainen; Teemu Niiranen; Pekka Mäntyselkä
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 9.  Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Eric Crespo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.