Literature DB >> 3653313

Cortical mapping and laminar analysis of the cutaneous and proprioceptive inputs from the rat foreleg: an extra- and intra-cellular study.

Y Gioanni1.   

Abstract

The foreleg proprioceptive and cutaneous representations, in the Sm cortex of urethane-anesthetized rats was studied. Natural or electrical stimulations and stretches of single forearm muscles were used. Multiunitary, unitary or intra-cellular recordings were performed in the contra-lateral Sm cortex. The aims of the study were: 1- to compare the proprioceptive and cutaneous maps 2- to analyse the characteristics of the unitary responses and 3- to study the laminar distribution of cutaneous and muscular inputs. It is shown that: 1- the proprioceptive and cutaneous representations overlapped, except in the anterior part where only proprioceptive (mainly articular) responses were obtained. The representation of each stretched muscle extended over the whole cutaneous area, showing a total overlap between inputs from these muscles. 2- 46% of the intracellularly recorded cells (n = 215) responded to peripheral stimulation, and 30.7% were influenced by (at least) muscle stretch. The majority of excited cells showed cross-modal convergence, and among neurons responding to muscle stretch, 60% received inputs from the two muscles stretched. Two categories of EPSPs were found, and four neurons responded to cutaneous or muscular stimulation with a burst. 19% of the responding cells were inhibited by peripheral--mainly cutaneous--stimulation. 3- Excited neurons were recorded in all layers, with just over half located in layer IV, whereas IPSPs were obtained mainly in layer V. The cells excited by cutaneous and muscular inputs (convergent neurons) were preponderant in layers IV to VI. This work shows that the cutaneous and muscular inputs reach the same area in Sm cortex, and that a majority of excited cells are "convergent". The results are not in favor of an area 3a (by analogy with cats and monkeys) in the rat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3653313     DOI: 10.1007/BF00247284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex.

Authors:  D A McCormick; B W Connors; J W Lighthall; D A Prince
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Thalamocortical synaptic relations: a review with emphasis on the projections of specific thalamic nuclei to the primary sensory areas of the neocortex.

Authors:  E L White
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Natural stimulation of group I activated cells in the cerebral cortex of the awake cat.

Authors:  I Rosén; H Asanuma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1973-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Projection from low-threshold muscle afferents of hand and forearm to area 3a of baboon's cortex.

Authors:  C G Phillips; T P Powell; M Wiesendanger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Inputs from low threshold muscle and cutaneous afferents of hand and forearm to areas 3a and 3b of baboon's cerebral cortex.

Authors:  C J Heath; J Hore; C G Phillips
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The motor cortex of the rat: cytoarchitecture and microstimulation mapping.

Authors:  J P Donoghue; S P Wise
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1982-11-20       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Patterns of afferent projections to transitional zones in the somatic sensorimotor cerebral cortex of albino rats.

Authors:  W Welker; K J Sanderson; G M Shambes
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-02-06       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Double representation of the body surface within cytoarchitectonic areas 3b and 1 in "SI" in the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus).

Authors:  M M Merzenich; J H Kaas; M Sur; C S Lin
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1978-09-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  A reappraisal of rat motor cortex organization by intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Y Gioanni; M Lamarche
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-09-30       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Mechanisms of neocortical epileptogenesis in vitro.

Authors:  M J Gutnick; B W Connors; D A Prince
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cortical modulation of thalamo-cortical neurons relaying exteroceptive information: a microstimulation study in the guinea pig.

Authors:  C Rapisarda; A Palmeri; S Sapienza
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Early development of SI cortical barrel subfield representation of forelimb in normal and deafferented neonatal rat as delineated by peroxidase conjugated lectin, peanut agglutinin (PNA).

Authors:  R S Waters; C A McCandlish; N G Cooper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Relationship between the organization of the forepaw barrel subfield and the representation of the forepaw in layer IV of rat somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  R S Waters; C X Li; C A McCandlish
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Primary somatosensory cortex in rats with pain-related behaviours due to a peripheral mononeuropathy after moderate ligation of one sciatic nerve: neuronal responsivity to somatic stimulation.

Authors:  G Guilbaud; J M Benoist; A Levante; M Gautron; J C Willer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hypergravity within a critical period impacts on the maturation of somatosensory cortical maps and their potential for use-dependent plasticity in the adult.

Authors:  Yoh'i Zennou-Azogui; Nicolas Catz; Christian Xerri
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The neural response properties and cortical organization of a rapidly adapting muscle sensory group response that overlaps with the frequencies that elicit the kinesthetic illusion.

Authors:  Paul D Marasco; Dennis J Bourbeau; Courtney E Shell; Rafael Granja-Vazquez; Jason G Ina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of forced movements on learning: Findings from a choice reaction time task in rats.

Authors:  Hidekazu Kaneko; Hiroto Sano; Yasuhisa Hasegawa; Hiroshi Tamura; Shinya S Suzuki
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.