| Literature DB >> 364988 |
Abstract
1. The techniques required in the removal of highly filled composite adhesives at the end of orthodontic treatment on an average cause more loss of enamel than removal of an unfilled polymethylmethacrylate adhesive. 2. The amount of enamel lost during the removal of either adhesive may be of clinical significance because of the removal of a major part of the protective fluoride-rich layer of enamel. 3. The use of zirconium silicate on a rotating bristle brush may cause considerable abrasion of enamel.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1978 PMID: 364988 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90005-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Orthod ISSN: 0002-9416