Literature DB >> 3635052

Development and testing of the circumvaginal muscles rating scale.

A M Worth, M C Dougherty, P L McKey.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to develop an instrument for clinical assessment of the circumvaginal muscles (CVM), to test the reliability of the instrument, and to correlate sample characteristics with this instrument. The 9-point CVM Rating Scale is based on four components: pressure, duration, muscle ribbing, and position of the examiner's finger during examination. Reliability of the CVM Rating Scale was ascertained by use of interrater and test-retest reliability. Interrater reliability was tested on two separate occasions, N = 10, rho = 0.6, p less than .04; N = 10, rho = 0.7, p less than .05. A test-retest sequence was conducted 10 days apart, N = 10, rho = 0.9, p less than .003. Results from these tests indicated that the CVM Rating Scale is a reliable instrument for assessing CVM. A convenience sample of 30 women, aged 18-37, in good general health was tested, using the CVM Rating Scale. Women with a history of pelvic floor reconstructive surgery were excluded. A significant positive correlation between self-reported orgasm and the CVM Rating Scale total scores was found, chi 2 = 7.5, p less than .02. No significant correlations were found between age, race, parity, episiotomy, or self-reported Kegel exercises and the CVM Rating Scale total scores. The scale is a cost-effective, time-efficient, systematic assessment, accessible in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3635052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  5 in total

1.  Dynamic assessment of pelvic floor function in women using the intravaginal device test.

Authors:  O Contreras Ortiz; F Coya Nuñez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1996

2.  Interrater reliability and physical examination of the pubovisceral portion of the levator ani muscle, validity comparisons using MR imaging.

Authors:  Rohna Kearney; Janis M Miller; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Measurement of pelvic floor muscular strength with the Colpexin pull test: a comparative study.

Authors:  Marjorie Jean-Michel; Daniel H Biller; James F Bena; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Initial experience with a new method for the dynamic assessment of pelvic floor function in women: the Kolpexin Pull Test.

Authors:  Nathan Guerette; Minda Neimark; Stacy L Kopka; Jacob E Jones; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-01-09

5.  Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment in healthy continent women.

Authors:  Dulcegleika V B Sartori; Monica O Gameiro; Hamilto A Yamamoto; Paulo R Kawano; Rodrigo Guerra; Carlos R Padovani; João L Amaro
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.