Literature DB >> 3631872

The value of routine preoperative investigations.

R F McKee, E M Scott.   

Abstract

In a prospective study of 400 patients admitted for elective surgery, the value of preoperative investigations in identifying the group at high risk of complications was assessed. In order to evaluate methods of reducing the number of investigations a preoperative questionnaire was used and patients were also grouped with regard to age and extent of surgery. Sixteen per cent of the results of the preoperative investigations showed some abnormality but only 0.013% caused a change in management. Abnormal results were significantly associated with complications (P less than 0.05). A positive (abnormal) questionnaire and increased age together defined a group more likely to have abnormal results (P less than 0.05) but age was a more specific indicator. The extent of surgery was not associated with abnormal results other than biochemistry results but was associated with complications (P less than 0.01) and with the need to repeat investigations postoperatively. It was concluded that a preoperative questionnaire might be useful in the assessment of day case patients, where a larger fraction would be expected to fall into the low risk group. A policy for routine preoperative investigation was drawn up. Full blood count should be performed in all patients over 40 years, ECG in all patients over 50 years and CXR and urea and electrolytes in patients over 60 years undergoing major surgery. Asymptomatic patients out with these categories do not require routine investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3631872      PMCID: PMC2498452     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  5 in total

1.  Is there a need for routine preoperative laboratory tests?

Authors:  G D Lundberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Preoperative assessment for outpatient anaesthesia.

Authors:  W N Rollason; G Hems
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  An evaluation of a pre-operative anaesthetic assessment questionnaire.

Authors:  R M Pearson; R H Jago
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  The usefulness of preoperative laboratory screening.

Authors:  E B Kaplan; L B Sheiner; A J Boeckmann; M F Roizen; S L Beal; S N Cohen; C D Nicoll
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Costs of unnecessary tests.

Authors:  G Sandler
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-07-07
  5 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative patient evaluation.

Authors:  M Roizen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Use of "smart technology" in dentistry and medicine.

Authors:  M F Roizen
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Preoperative biochemical screening.

Authors:  I T Campbell; P Gosling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-01

Review 4.  The usefulness of the preoperative electrocardiogram.

Authors:  M F Roizen
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1993-04

5.  An audit of the preoperative investigation of surgical patients.

Authors:  P J Billings; J P Davies; R Richards; D A Aubrey
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Preoperative patient assessment: a review of the literature and recommendations.

Authors:  N A Barnard; R W Williams; E M Spencer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Do children need routine preoperative blood tests and blood cross matching in orthopaedic practice?

Authors:  M W Jones; I A Harvey; R Owen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Routine preoperative chest X-rays.

Authors:  G J McCleane
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 9.  Preoperative evaluation and a risk assessment in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab; Michael Wayne; Michael Cioroiu; Lee M Zank; Christopher Mills
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  A retrospective analysis of the clinical impact of 939 chest radiographs using the medical records.

Authors:  Mats Geijer; Liz Ivarsson; Jan H Göthlin
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.