The value of aortic arch study in the evaluation of cerebrovascular insufficiency.

In evaluation of extracranial carotid vascular disease, the use of arteriography has long been considered essential. With increasing expertise in noninvasive testing, the importance of extensive dye studies is being questioned. The data presented herein indicate that proper preangiographic evaluation of the patient population drastically reduces the possibility of missing significant intrathoracic pathologic processes. Two subsets of patients should be recommended routinely for dye studies: those patients with unequal upper-extremity blood pressures and those without pathologic neck findings on noninvasive testing to account for their symptoms. When these patients are recognized as having the potential for intrathoracic disease, dye studies can be performed in situations that will generate the highest yield. Even with the continued use of dye studies in evaluation of cerebrovascular insufficiency, elimination of the aortic arch study will drastically reduce the dye load and, thus, the associated morbidity.