Literature DB >> 3630932

Pain threshold and tolerance in women with syndrome X and women with stable angina pectoris.

M Turiel, A R Galassi, J J Glazier, J C Kaski, A Maseri.   

Abstract

A recent report showed that during Holter monitoring of patients with syndrome X (typical anginal pain, positive exercise test response [at least 0.1 mV of ST-segment depression], no evidence of coronary spasm and angiographically normal coronary arteries), 50% of episodes of ischemic ST-segment depression were painful. This proportion is considerably higher than that in patients with chronic stable angina, which is about 30%. A significantly lower threshold and tolerance to painful stimuli was seen in a group of patients with chronic stable angina in whom 50% of episodes were painful compared with a group in whom only 5% of episodes were silent. Hence, patients with syndrome X may have enhanced sensitivity to painful stimuli. To investigate whether this difference was due to a lower threshold for painful stimuli in general, 12 patients with syndrome X and 10 (age- and sex-matched) with chronic stable angina were studied using the same battery of painful stimuli. Patients with syndrome X had a significantly lower threshold and tolerance for forearm ischemia (-36%, p less than 0.05, and -40%, p less than 0.001) and electrical skin stimulation (-37%, p less than 0.01, and -35%, p less than 0.001); the cold pressor test did not show significant differences (-7%, p = 0.391, and -1%, p = 0.818). Thus, patients with syndrome X in this study had significantly lower threshold and tolerance values for forearm ischemia and for electrical skin stimulation. These differences in sensitivity to pain may partly explain a higher incidence of painful ischemic episodes detected by ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring during unrestricted daily life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3630932     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90294-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  13 in total

1.  Effect of oral aminophylline in patients with angina and normal coronary arteriograms (cardiac syndrome X).

Authors:  P M Elliott; K Krzyzowska-Dickinson; R Calvino; C Hann; J C Kaski
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The complex link between brain and heart in cardiac syndrome X.

Authors:  G A Lanza; F Crea
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Cardiac syndrome X and microvascular coronary dysfunction.

Authors:  Erika Jones; Wafia Eteiba; Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 6.677

Review 4.  Abnormal cardiac nerve function in syndrome X.

Authors:  G A Lanza
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 5.  Cardiac syndrome X in women: the role of oestrogen deficiency.

Authors:  J C Kaski
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Syndrome X--angina and normal coronary angiography.

Authors:  A Chauhan
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Lower threshold for adenosine-induced chest pain in patients with angina and normal coronary angiograms.

Authors:  B Lagerqvist; C Sylvén; A Waldenström
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-09

8.  Clinical presentation and functional prognosis in syndrome X.

Authors:  A Chauhan; P A Mullins; S I Thuraisingham; M C Petch; P M Schofield
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-10

9.  Concentration of circulating plasma endothelin in patients with angina and normal coronary angiograms.

Authors:  J C Kaski; P M Elliott; O Salomone; K Dickinson; D Gordon; C Hann; D W Holt
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-12

Review 10.  Mechanisms of pain in angina pectoris--a critical review of the adenosine hypothesis.

Authors:  C Sylvén
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.