Literature DB >> 363071

A comparative study of Butacote and Naprosyn in ankylosing spondylitis.

B M Ansell, G Major, S P Liyanage, J M Gumpel, M H Seifert, J A Mathews, C Engler.   

Abstract

A double-blind, cross-over comparison of Naprosyn (naproxen) 750 mg daily and Butacote (enteric-coated phenylbutazone) 300 mg daily was carried out in a multi-centre trial. Twenty-five patients, mostly male and under 40 years of age, were entered. After a 2-week period in which any existing anti-inflammatory drugs were tailed off, patients were entered into the trial and treated for 1 month with each drug. Patients were assessed at 4-weekly intervals. Both drugs significantly reduced morning stiffness. Morning pain and discomfort and wall-tragus distance were also significantly reduced by both drugs during the trial. Results of the Schober test showed improvement during both treatment periods. There were no overall statistically significant differences between the effects of the 2 drugs on objective parameters. However, overall subjective assessment of symptoms showed a greater improvement on Butacote. Treatment preferences by physician and subjective assessment by the patient both favoured Butacote but the difference between the 2 drugs was not statistically significant. Side effects were mostly of a minor nature. One patient had to discontinue the trial, due to indigestion while taking Butacote.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 363071      PMCID: PMC1000272          DOI: 10.1136/ard.37.5.436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  5 in total

1.  Naproxen in treatment of ankylosing spondylitis [Proceedings].

Authors:  H F Hill; A G Hill
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Adverse reactions to non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs.

Authors:  M F Cuthbert
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 2.580

3.  Assessment of enteric-coated phenylbutazone in general practice.

Authors:  W A Rushford; P D Fowler
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1970-11

4.  Normal range of spinal mobility. An objective clinical study.

Authors:  J M Moll; V Wright
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Phenylbutazone (butazolidin).

Authors:  F D HART
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1953-07
  5 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Current evidence for the management of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic literature review for the ASAS/EULAR management recommendations in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  J Zochling; D van der Heijde; M Dougados; J Braun
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Pharmacological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pauline Boulos; Maxime Dougados; Stuart M Macleod; Elke Hunsche
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Current guidelines for the drug treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  E Toussirot; D Wendling
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  A comparison of diflunisal and phenylbutazone in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  M J Franssen; F W Gribnau; L B van de Putte
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Ankylosing spondylitis. Current drug treatment.

Authors:  J T Gran; G Husby
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for axial spondyloarthritis (ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis).

Authors:  Féline P B Kroon; Lennart R A van der Burg; Sofia Ramiro; Robert B M Landewé; Rachelle Buchbinder; Louise Falzon; Désirée van der Heijde
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.