Literature DB >> 363053

Comparison of netilmicin and amikacin in treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

S Maigaard, N Frimodt-Möller, P O Madsen.   

Abstract

Netilmicin and amikacin, two recently developed aminoglycosides, were compared in a prospective, randomized study of 57 male patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Both drugs were administered intramuscularly every 12 h for 7 to 10 days, netilmicin at 2 mg/kg and amikacin at 7.5 mg/kg. The two groups were comparable as to infecting bacteria and underlying pathology of the urinary tract. No patients had indwelling catheters. All microorganisms isolated were sensitive to both antibiotics. A total of 69% of the patients treated with netilmicin and 57% of the patients treated with amikacin were cured of the infection, as defined by a negative culture at 7 days after discontinuation of treatment. No major side effects were recorded, and no significant changes were noted in parameters of renal function. Of the patients treated with amikacin, 21% experienced temporary local pain at the injection site; no such effect was noted in the netilmicin-treated group. Therefore, netilmicin appeared to be as effective and better tolerated than did amikacin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 363053      PMCID: PMC352505          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.14.4.544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  13 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of amikacin in patients with impaired renal function.

Authors:  M C McHenry; J G Wagner; P M Hall; D G Vidt; T L Gavan
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Netilmicin pharmacokinetics after single intravenous doses to elderly male patients.

Authors:  P G Welling; A Baumueller; C C Lau; P O Madsen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. Comparative study of sisomicin and gentamicin.

Authors:  P O Madsen; T B Kjaer; A Mosegaard
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Clinical evaluation of amikacin in treatment of infections due to gram-negative aerobic bacilli.

Authors:  R G Mathias; A R Ronald; M J Gurwith; D W McCullough; H G Stiver; J Berger; C Y Cates; L M Fox; B A Lank
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Pharmacokinetic and clinical studies with amikacin, a new aminoglycoside antibiotic.

Authors:  H Lode; K Grunert; P Koeppe; H Langmaack
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Controlled comparison of amikacin and gentamicin.

Authors:  C R Smith; K L Baughman; C Q Edwards; J F Rogers; P S Lietman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-02-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Amikacin Therapy of Urinary tract infections.

Authors:  C E Cox
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  A review of results of clinical trials with amikacin.

Authors:  P G Gooding; E Berman; A Z Lane; K Agre
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Antimicrobial activity in vitro of netilmicin and comparison with sisomicin, gentamicin, and tobramycin.

Authors:  B R Meyers; S Z Hirschman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  In vitro activity of netilmicin, gentamicin, and amikacin.

Authors:  R J Kantor; C W Norden
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  7 in total

1.  Prospective comparative study of efficacy and toxicity of netilmicin and amikacin.

Authors:  B V Bock; P H Edelstein; R D Meyer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Prospective, randomized trial of netilmicin and amikacin, with emphasis on eighth-nerve toxicity.

Authors:  M Barza; M W Lauermann; F P Tally; S L Gorbach
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors predisposing to auditory toxicity in patients receiving aminoglycosides.

Authors:  J M Gatell; F Ferran; V Araujo; M Bonet; E Soriano; J Traserra; J G SanMiguel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparison of moxalactam and gentamicin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

Authors:  R G Penn; L C Preheim; C C Sanders; D K Giger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Netilmicin treatment of complicated urinary tract infection in patients with renal function impairment.

Authors:  N Frimodt-Möller; S Maigaard; P O Madsen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Netilmicin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  D M Campoli-Richards; S Chaplin; R H Sayce; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Prospective randomized double-blind comparison of nephrotoxicity and auditory toxicity of tobramycin and netilmicin.

Authors:  J M Gatell; J G SanMiguel; V Araujo; L Zamora; J Maña; M Ferrer; M Bonet; M Bohe; M T Jimenez de Anta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.191

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.