Literature DB >> 3629768

New method of evaluating sperm morphology with predictive value for human in vitro fertilization.

T F Kruger, A A Acosta, K F Simmons, R J Swanson, J F Matta, L L Veeck, M Morshedi, S Brugo.   

Abstract

A prospective study was planned to evaluate sperm morphology as a parameter to predict the fertilization outcome in an in vitro fertilization program. Couples applying to in vitro fertilization were admitted into this project when the sperm concentration was greater than 20 million per mL and motility greater than 30 per cent. Based on new strict criteria for evaluating normal sperm morphology, patients were divided prospectively into 2 groups. In group I (25 patients) normal sperm morphology was less than 14 per cent, and in group II (71 patients) normal sperm morphology was greater than 14 per cent, using a threshold established previously. Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate different parameters: concentration, motility, and morphology against the dependent variables, fertilization, and cleavage. The only factor which was significantly correlated with fertilization and cleavage was normal sperm morphology (P less than 0.0001). The fertilization rate (per oocyte) and the cleavage rate were 49.4 per cent and 47.6 per cent in group I and 88.3 per cent and 87 per cent in group II (P less than 0.0001). The ongoing pregnancy rate per laparoscopy and per embryo transfer was 4 per cent and 5.5 per cent, respectively, in group I and 18.3 per cent and 18.5 per cent, respectively, in group II (no significant difference). This study demonstrates the value of analyzing sperm morphology using the criteria recommended in terms of predicting fertilization and perhaps pregnancy outcome. Patients can be better counseled and the probability of fertilization or no fertilization can be more accurately established. Furthermore a trend is shown in the pregnancy rate that may indicate the importance of the male genome in establishing a pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3629768     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(87)90246-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  34 in total

1.  Acrosome index is not an absolute predictor of the outcome following conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  B Söderlund; K Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  An evaluation of the efficacy of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for sperm with low hypoosmotic swelling test scores and poor morphology.

Authors:  Matthew Check; Jerome H Check; Donna Summers-Chase; Kimberly Swenson; Wei Yuan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Retention of membrane charge attributes by cryopreserved-thawed sperm and zeta selection.

Authors:  Tricia L Kam; John D Jacobson; William C Patton; Johannah U Corselli; Philip J Chan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Clinical outcome of magnetic activated cell sorting of non-apoptotic spermatozoa before density gradient centrifugation for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Enver Kerem Dirican; Osman Denizhan Ozgün; Süleyman Akarsu; Kadir Okhan Akin; Ozge Ercan; Mukaddes Uğurlu; Cağri Camsari; Oya Kanyilmaz; Adnan Kaya; Ali Unsal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Study of the effect of varicocelectomy on sperm proteins expression in patients with varicocele and poor sperm quality by using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  Hani Hosseinifar; Marjan Sabbaghian; Davood Nasrabadi; Tahereh Modarresi; Ahmad Vosough Taqi Dizaj; Hamid Gourabi; Mohmmad Ali Sadighi Gilani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Discordance in sperm morphology determination by strict criteria (SC) and WHO criteria, pointing out the necessity of sperm morphology determination by SC.

Authors:  R Molina; S Brugo; J Olmedo; N Kuperman; L Maldonado; G Estofán; D Estofán; M Hernández; P Estofán; J Novillo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  The biology of infertility: research advances and clinical challenges.

Authors:  Martin M Matzuk; Dolores J Lamb
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Correlation of post swim-up acrosome index with in-vitro fertilization outcomes.

Authors:  Meltem Ozguner; Oya Evirgen; Baha Oral
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 9.  Role of Abnormal Sperm Morphology in Predicting Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Samuel A Shabtaie; Sabrina A Gerkowicz; Taylor P Kohn; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Isolated teratozoospermia and in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  H Figueiredo; A Tavares; L Ferrás; A Couceiro; I Chaves
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.