Literature DB >> 3629429

The new International Staging System for Lung Cancer.

C F Mountain.   

Abstract

The International Staging System for Lung Cancer provides for classification of six levels of disease extent in five stage groups that relate to patient management and prognosis. Stage 0 is reserved for patients with carcinoma in situ. The Stage I and II definitions provide for classification of two levels of disease extent completely contained within the lung that have different prognostic and therapeutic implications. Definitive resection is the first choice of therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer in these stage groups. The Stage II category takes into account the erosion of survival expectations in the optimum group of T1 and T2 patients as a consequence of intrapulmonary lymph node involvement. Although small cell carcinoma is infrequently encountered as Stage I and Stage II disease, these classifications may be useful in the structure of investigational programs involving adjuvant surgery. The exclusion of distant metastases and the division of Stage III into two levels of extrapulmonary disease allow for selection of patients for specific treatment plans. Patients with non-small cell tumors with Stage IIIa disease usually are candidates for definitive surgical treatment. The specificity of the T and N definitions in the Stage IIIa and IIIb categories identifies patients for whom particular radiotherapy treatment plans are structured and protocol assignments are made. It is consistent with patient management concepts that all those with distant metastases are classified as having Stage IV disease. Implications of the system for selection of surgical, radiotherapeutic, and chemotherapeutic regimens are rational for all cell types. The classification meets the requirement for simplicity and can be readily applied in a broad spectrum of clinical and teaching environments. It is, however, sufficiently specific to be useful for reporting results of investigational therapies. Prospective use of the classification should encourage precision in clinical evaluations that exploit full use of refinements in imaging technologies. The cooperative efforts of the Task Force on Lung of the AJCC and the TNM Committees of the UICC to bring this classification system to fruition and international acceptance have been described. It has been adopted by these groups and others, including the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, the Japanese Cancer Committee, and the Spanish Society of Respiratory Disease, as their official recommendation for staging lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3629429     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)44330-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  13 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer . 3: Fluorescence bronchoscopy: clinical dilemmas and research opportunities.

Authors:  A K Banerjee; P H Rabbitts; J George
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Management of solitary pulmonary nodules: how do thoracic computed tomography and guided fine needle biopsy influence clinical decisions?

Authors:  D R Baldwin; T Eaton; J Kolbe; T Christmas; D Milne; J Mercer; E Steele; J Garrett; M L Wilsher; A U Wells
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  Lung cancer staging: clinical and radiologic perspectives.

Authors:  Sophie Chheang; Kathleen Brown
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Robust gene expression signature from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples predicts prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Yang Xie; Guanghua Xiao; Kevin R Coombes; Carmen Behrens; Luisa M Solis; Gabriela Raso; Luc Girard; Heidi S Erickson; Jack Roth; John V Heymach; Cesar Moran; Kathy Danenberg; John D Minna; Ignacio I Wistuba
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Dipeptidyl peptidase IV, prolyl endopeptidase and cathepsin B activities in primary human lung tumors and lung parenchyma.

Authors:  A Sedo; E Krepela; E Kasafírek
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Surgical treatment of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Sandra Utzschneider; Ewa Wicherek; Patrick Weber; Gerwin Schmidt; Volkmar Jansson; Hans Roland Dürr
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Bronchoscopic NdYAG laser treatment in lung cancer, 30 years on: an institutional review.

Authors:  K Moghissi; Kate Dixon
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  The role of ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide in the multi-modality treatment after surgery for cure for small-cell bronchial carcinomas (SCLC).

Authors:  K Karrer; H Denck; H Karnicka-Mlodkowska; P Drings; J Orel; G M Salzer; M Thermann; A Lattuneddu; Y Sun; E Hata
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1989

Review 9.  [Prognosis-adapted surgical management of bone metastases].

Authors:  S Utzschneider; P Weber; A Fottner; B Wegener; V Jansson; H R Dürr
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Evaluation of the treatment response of lung cancer with positron emission tomography and L-[methyl-11C]methionine: a preliminary study.

Authors:  K Kubota; S Yamada; K Ishiwata; M Ito; T Fujiwara; H Fukuda; M Tada; T Ido
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.