Literature DB >> 3628454

Genetic and environmental factors in ethanol self-administration.

F R George.   

Abstract

Findings presented in this paper from pharmacogenetic studies of oral ethanol self-administration suggest a correlation between ethanol preference and self-administration and indicate that there are important genetic as well as environmental determinants of ethanol reinforced behavior. AA (alcohol accepting) and ANA (alcohol nonaccepting) rats, animals bred selectively for differential ethanol preference, showed large differences in operant responding for ethanol. AA rats drank significantly more ethanol than water, and their intake varied as a function of ethanol concentration. Intake of water and ethanol solutions did not differ in the ANA rats. In two inbred strains of rats, F344 and LEWIS, ethanol maintained higher response rates and was consumed in larger volumes than the water vehicle. In a third series of studies, C57BL/6J mice, which exhibit high ethanol preference and low sensitivity, readily self-administered ethanol in an operant situation. Conversely, BALB/cJ mice, which exhibit low preference and high sensitivity, were not positively reinforced by ethanol. The results demonstrate the experimental control possible by the utilization of genetically defined animals, even when complex learned behavioral sequences are being measured, and indicate that genotype and environment interact in a complex but definable way to determine the degree to which ethanol comes to function as a positive reinforcer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3628454     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(87)90586-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  10 in total

Review 1.  The AA and ANA rat lines, selected for differences in voluntary alcohol consumption.

Authors:  J D Sinclair; A D Lê; K Kiianmaa
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1989-09-15

2.  Effects of fluvoxamine on a multiple schedule of ethanol- and food-maintained behavior in two rat strains.

Authors:  Brett C Ginsburg; Wouter Koek; Martin A Javors; R J Lamb
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Cholinergic mechanisms in physical dependence on barbiturates, ethanol and benzodiazepines.

Authors:  A Nordberg; G Wahlström
Journal:  J Neural Transm Gen Sect       Date:  1992

4.  Genetic differences in the rewarding and activating effects of morphine and ethanol.

Authors:  C L Cunningham; D R Niehus; D H Malott; L K Prather
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Fixed-ratio schedules of oral ethanol self-administration in inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  G I Elmer; R A Meisch; S R Goldberg; F R George
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Inbred mouse strains vary in oral self-selection of nicotine.

Authors:  S F Robinson; M J Marks; A C Collins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Localization of genes influencing ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in BXD recombinant inbred mice.

Authors:  C L Cunningham
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Fischer 344 and Lewis Rat Strains as a Model of Genetic Vulnerability to Drug Addiction.

Authors:  Cristina Cadoni
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Fischer rats consume 20% ethanol in a long-term intermittent-access two-bottle-choice paradigm.

Authors:  Douglas J Mill; Jade J Bito-Onon; Jeffrey A Simms; Rui Li; Selena E Bartlett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Shortening time for access to alcohol drives up front-loading behavior, bringing consumption in male rats to the level of females.

Authors:  Annabelle Flores-Bonilla; Barbara De Oliveira; Andrea Silva-Gotay; Kyle W Lucier; Heather N Richardson
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 5.027

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.