Literature DB >> 36278987

The role of anal manometry in the follow-up of women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI).

Hawra Badri1, Gillian Fowler2, Steven Lane3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Mode of birth (MOB) following OASI is determined by choice, symptoms and anorectal study results in asymptomatic women. Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) is the gold-standard imaging modality. EAUS use in MOB counselling is supported by strong evidence. Less is understood about how anal manometry (AM) influences MOB counselling.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted from 2007 to 2020. Women underwent symptom assessment using validated ePAQ and St Mark's incontinence score (SMIS). Anorectal studies using EAUS and AM were performed. The case group was the normal ultrasound group and the control group was the abnormal ultrasound group. Both groups were compared with normal and abnormal AM result groups.
RESULTS: A total of 1348 women were included over 13 years. Among these, 454 women were symptomatic, 894 were asymptomatic; 274 (31%) asymptomatic women had isolated abnormal AM results, 313 (35%) had two abnormal anorectal results and 221 (24.7%) had normal anorectal results. Eighty-six asymptomatic women (10.4%) had isolated abnormal EAUS results, 138 (30.4%) symptomatic women had isolated abnormal AM, 221 (48.7%) had two abnormal anorectal results and 57 (12.6%) had normal anorectal results. Thirty-eight symptomatic women (8.4%) had an isolated abnormal EAUS result.
CONCLUSIONS: AM identifies more women with sphincter function impairment than EAUS alone. Without AM, almost one third of asymptomatic women would not have been identified and could have been inadequately counselled. Performing AM and EAUS together captured most women with compromised anal sphincter function. We conclude that AM should be performed in all women with OASI alongside EAUS to enable accurate MOB counselling.
© 2022. The International Urogynecological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal manometry; Anorectal studies; Endoanal ultrasound; Mode of birth; Obstetric anal sphincter injuries

Year:  2022        PMID: 36278987     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05380-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   1.932


  2 in total

Review 1.  Faecal incontinence.

Authors:  D R Chatoor; S J Taylor; C R G Cohen; A V Emmanuel
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Objective methods cannot predict anal incontinence after primary repair of extensive anal tears.

Authors:  A R Goffeng; B Andersch; M Andersson; I Berndtsson; L Hulten; T Oresland
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.636

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.