Literature DB >> 36273023

Singleplex, multiplex and pooled sample real-time RT-PCR assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an occupational medicine setting.

Kimberly S Butler1, Bryan D Carson1, Joshua D Podlevsky1, Cathryn M Mayes2, Jessica M Rowland3, DeAnna Campbell4, J Bryce Ricken1, George Wudiri5, Jerilyn A Timlin6,7.   

Abstract

For workplaces which cannot operate as telework or remotely, there is a critical need for routine occupational SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing. Although diagnostic tests including the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel (CDC Diagnostic Panel) (EUA200001) were made available early in the pandemic, resource scarcity and high demand for reagents and equipment necessitated priority of symptomatic patients. There is a clearly defined need for flexible testing methodologies and strategies with rapid turnaround of results for (1) symptomatic, (2) asymptomatic with high-risk exposures and (3) asymptomatic populations without preexisting conditions for routine screening to address the needs of an on-site work force. We developed a distinct SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic assay based on the original CDC Diagnostic Panel (EUA200001), yet, with minimum overlap for currently employed reagents to eliminate direct competition for limited resources. As the pandemic progressed with testing loads increasing, we modified the assay to include 5-sample pooling and amplicon target multiplexing. Analytical sensitivity of the pooled and multiplexed assays was rigorously tested with contrived positive samples in realistic patient backgrounds. Assay performance was determined with clinical samples previously assessed with an FDA authorized assay. Throughout the pandemic we successfully tested symptomatic, known contact and travelers within our occupational population with a ~ 24-48-h turnaround time to limit the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. Our singleplex assay had a detection limit of 31.25 copies per reaction. The three-color multiplexed assay maintained similar sensitivity to the singleplex assay, while tripling the throughput. The pooling assay further increased the throughput to five-fold the singleplex assay, albeit with a subtle loss of sensitivity. We subsequently developed a hybrid 'multiplex-pooled' strategy to testing to address the need for both rapid analysis of samples from personnel at high risk of COVID infection and routine screening. Herein, our SARS-CoV-2 assays specifically address the needs of occupational healthcare for both rapid analysis of personnel at high-risk of infection and routine screening that is essential for controlling COVID-19 disease transmission. In addition to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, this work demonstrates successful flexible assays developments and deployments with implications for emerging highly transmissible diseases and future pandemics.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36273023     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22106-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  40 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review.

Authors:  W Joost Wiersinga; Andrew Rhodes; Allen C Cheng; Sharon J Peacock; Hallie C Prescott
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China.

Authors:  Shengjie Lai; Nick W Ruktanonchai; Liangcai Zhou; Olivia Prosper; Wei Luo; Jessica R Floyd; Amy Wesolowski; Mauricio Santillana; Chi Zhang; Xiangjun Du; Hongjie Yu; Andrew J Tatem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Assay Techniques and Test Development for COVID-19 Diagnosis.

Authors:  Linda J Carter; Linda V Garner; Jeffrey W Smoot; Yingzhu Li; Qiongqiong Zhou; Catherine J Saveson; Janet M Sasso; Anne C Gregg; Divya J Soares; Tiffany R Beskid; Susan R Jervey; Cynthia Liu
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 14.553

4.  First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States.

Authors:  Michelle L Holshue; Chas DeBolt; Scott Lindquist; Kathy H Lofy; John Wiesman; Hollianne Bruce; Christopher Spitters; Keith Ericson; Sara Wilkerson; Ahmet Tural; George Diaz; Amanda Cohn; LeAnne Fox; Anita Patel; Susan I Gerber; Lindsay Kim; Suxiang Tong; Xiaoyan Lu; Steve Lindstrom; Mark A Pallansch; William C Weldon; Holly M Biggs; Timothy M Uyeki; Satish K Pillai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A modeling study to inform screening and testing interventions for the control of SARS-CoV-2 on university campuses.

Authors:  Ben Lopman; Carol Y Liu; Adrien Le Guillou; Andreas Handel; Timothy L Lash; Alexander P Isakov; Samuel M Jenness
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Testing at scale during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Tim R Mercer; Marc Salit
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 59.581

7.  The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modelling study.

Authors:  Kiesha Prem; Yang Liu; Timothy W Russell; Adam J Kucharski; Rosalind M Eggo; Nicholas Davies; Mark Jit; Petra Klepac
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2020-03-25

8.  COVID-19: extending or relaxing distancing control measures.

Authors:  Tim Colbourn
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2020-03-25

9.  The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China.

Authors:  Moritz U G Kraemer; Chia-Hung Yang; Bernardo Gutierrez; Chieh-Hsi Wu; Brennan Klein; David M Pigott; Louis du Plessis; Nuno R Faria; Ruoran Li; William P Hanage; John S Brownstein; Maylis Layan; Alessandro Vespignani; Huaiyu Tian; Christopher Dye; Oliver G Pybus; Samuel V Scarpino
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.

Authors:  Ben Hu; Hua Guo; Peng Zhou; Zheng-Li Shi
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 78.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.