Literature DB >> 36273017

Evidence of visual crossmodal reorganization positively relates to speech outcomes in cochlear implant users.

Brandon T Paul1, Münir Demir Bajin2, Mila Uzelac3, Joseph Chen2,4, Trung Le2,4, Vincent Lin2,4, Andrew Dimitrijevic5,6,7.   

Abstract

Deaf individuals who use a cochlear implant (CI) have remarkably different outcomes for auditory speech communication ability. One factor assumed to affect CI outcomes is visual crossmodal plasticity in auditory cortex, where deprived auditory regions begin to support non-auditory functions such as vision. Previous research has viewed crossmodal plasticity as harmful for speech outcomes for CI users if it interferes with sound processing, while others have demonstrated that plasticity related to visual language may be beneficial for speech recovery. To clarify, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure brain responses to a partial face speaking a silent single-syllable word (visual language) in 15 CI users and 13 age-matched typical-hearing controls. We used source analysis on EEG activity to measure crossmodal visual responses in auditory cortex and then compared them to CI users' speech-in-noise listening ability. CI users' brain response to the onset of the video stimulus (face) was larger than controls in left auditory cortex, consistent with crossmodal activation after deafness. CI users also produced a mixture of alpha (8-12 Hz) synchronization and desynchronization in auditory cortex while watching lip movement while controls instead showed desynchronization. CI users with higher speech scores had stronger crossmodal responses in auditory cortex to the onset of the video, but those with lower speech scores had increases in alpha power during lip movement in auditory areas. Therefore, evidence of crossmodal reorganization in CI users does not necessarily predict poor speech outcomes, and differences in crossmodal activation during lip reading may instead relate to strategies or differences that CI users use in audiovisual speech communication.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36273017     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22117-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  51 in total

1.  Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf.

Authors:  Stephen G Lomber; M Alex Meredith; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Adaptation to sensory loss.

Authors:  Patrice Voss; Olivier Collignon; Maryse Lassonde; Franco Lepore
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-02-16

Review 3.  Do deaf individuals see better?

Authors:  Daphne Bavelier; Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  Crossmodal reorganisation in deafness: Mechanisms for functional preservation and functional change.

Authors:  Velia Cardin; Konstantin Grin; Valeria Vinogradova; Barbara Manini
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Human brain plasticity: evidence from sensory deprivation and altered language experience.

Authors:  Helen Neville; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 6.  Unimodal and cross-modal plasticity in the 'deaf' auditory cortex.

Authors:  Andrej Kral
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 7.  Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  J P Rauschecker
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  The Organization of Working Memory Networks is Shaped by Early Sensory Experience.

Authors:  Velia Cardin; Mary Rudner; Rita F De Oliveira; Josefine Andin; Merina T Su; Lilli Beese; Bencie Woll; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Christophe Vincent; Frédéric Venail; Paul Van de Heyning; Eric Truy; Olivier Sterkers; Piotr H Skarzynski; Henryk Skarzynski; Karen Schauwers; Stephen O'Leary; Deborah Mawman; Bert Maat; Andrea Kleine-Punte; Alexander M Huber; Kevin Green; Paul J Govaerts; Bernard Fraysse; Richard Dowell; Norbert Dillier; Elaine Burke; Andy Beynon; François Bergeron; Deniz Başkent; Françoise Artières; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Cross-Modal Effects of Sensory Deprivation on Spatial and Temporal Processes in Vision and Audition: A Systematic Review on Behavioral and Neuroimaging Research since 2000.

Authors:  Laura Bell; Lisa Wagels; Christiane Neuschaefer-Rube; Janina Fels; Raquel E Gur; Kerstin Konrad
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.