Pilar Charle-Cuéllar1, Lidia Espí-Verdú1, Juan Goyanes1, Magloire Bunkembo2, Salimata Samake2, Mamadou Traore3, Adama Balla Coulibaly3, Aly Landouré4, Fatou Diawara4, Abdias Ogobara Dougnon5, Antonio Vargas1, Noemí López-Ejeda6. 1. Action Against Hunger Spain, C/ Duque de Sevilla No. 3. 28002, Madrid, Spain. 2. Action Against Hunger Mali, BP 2562, Bamako, Mali. 3. Nutrition Direction of the Ministry of Hygiene and Public Health, BP 232, Bamako, Mali. 4. Institut National de Recherche en Santé Publique, BP 235, Bamako, Mali. 5. Action Against Hunger West Africa Regional Office, BP 29621, Dakar, Senegal. 6. EPINUT Research Group (Ref. 920325), Faculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Unit of Physical Anthropology, Complutense University of Madrid, Jose Antonio Novais, 12, 8th Floor, 28040, Madrid, Spain. noemilop@ucm.es.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2015, the Ministry of Health in Mali included the treatment of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) into the package of activities of the integrated Community Case Management (iCCM). This paper aims to analyze the impact of including community health workers (CHWs) as treatment providers outside the Health Facilities (HFs) on the coverage of SAM treatment when scaling up the intervention in the three largest districts of the Kayes Region in Mali. METHODS: A baseline coverage assessment was conducted in August 2017 in the three districts before the CHWs started treating SAM. The end-line assessment was conducted one year later, in August 2018. Coverage was assessed by the standardized methodology called Semi-Quantitative Evaluation of Access and Coverage (SQUEAC). The primary outcome was treatment coverage and other variables evaluated were the geographical distribution of the HFs, CHW's sites and overlapping between both health providers, the estimation of children with geographical access to health care and the estimation of children screened for acute malnutrition in their communities. RESULTS: Treatment coverage increased in Kayes (28.7-57.1%) and Bafoulabé (20.4-61.1%) but did not in Kita (28.4-28.5%). The decentralization of treatment has not had the same impact on coverage in all districts, with significant differences. The geospatial analyses showed that Kita had a high proportion of overlap between HFs and/or CHWs 48.7% (39.2-58.2), a high proportion of children without geographical access to health care 70.4% (70.1-70.6), and a high proportion of children not screened for SAM in their communities 52.2% (51.9-52.5). CONCLUSIONS: Working with CHWs in SAM increases treatment coverage, but other critical aspects need to be considered by policymakers if this intervention model is intended to be scaled up at the country level. To improve families' access to nutritional health care, before establishing decentralized treatment in a whole region it must be considered the geographical location of CHWs. This previous assessment will avoid overlap among health providers and ensure the coverage of all unserved areas according to their population densities need. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry with ID 1990746. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14990746.
BACKGROUND: In 2015, the Ministry of Health in Mali included the treatment of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) into the package of activities of the integrated Community Case Management (iCCM). This paper aims to analyze the impact of including community health workers (CHWs) as treatment providers outside the Health Facilities (HFs) on the coverage of SAM treatment when scaling up the intervention in the three largest districts of the Kayes Region in Mali. METHODS: A baseline coverage assessment was conducted in August 2017 in the three districts before the CHWs started treating SAM. The end-line assessment was conducted one year later, in August 2018. Coverage was assessed by the standardized methodology called Semi-Quantitative Evaluation of Access and Coverage (SQUEAC). The primary outcome was treatment coverage and other variables evaluated were the geographical distribution of the HFs, CHW's sites and overlapping between both health providers, the estimation of children with geographical access to health care and the estimation of children screened for acute malnutrition in their communities. RESULTS: Treatment coverage increased in Kayes (28.7-57.1%) and Bafoulabé (20.4-61.1%) but did not in Kita (28.4-28.5%). The decentralization of treatment has not had the same impact on coverage in all districts, with significant differences. The geospatial analyses showed that Kita had a high proportion of overlap between HFs and/or CHWs 48.7% (39.2-58.2), a high proportion of children without geographical access to health care 70.4% (70.1-70.6), and a high proportion of children not screened for SAM in their communities 52.2% (51.9-52.5). CONCLUSIONS: Working with CHWs in SAM increases treatment coverage, but other critical aspects need to be considered by policymakers if this intervention model is intended to be scaled up at the country level. To improve families' access to nutritional health care, before establishing decentralized treatment in a whole region it must be considered the geographical location of CHWs. This previous assessment will avoid overlap among health providers and ensure the coverage of all unserved areas according to their population densities need. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry with ID 1990746. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14990746.
Keywords:
Community health workers (CHW); Coverage; Geographical accessibility; Integrated Community Case Management (iCCM); Severe acute malnutrition (SAM); Simplified approaches
Authors: J L Alvarez Morán; G B Franck Alé; P Charle; N Sessions; S Doumbia; S Guerrero Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jessica Bliss; Natasha Lelijveld; André Briend; Marko Kerac; Mark Manary; Marie McGrath; Zita Weise Prinzo; Susan Shepherd; Noël Marie Zagre; Sophie Woodhead; Saul Guerrero; Amy Mayberry Journal: Glob Health Sci Pract Date: 2018-10-04
Authors: Mercedes de Onis; Elaine Borghi; Mary Arimond; Patrick Webb; Trevor Croft; Kuntal Saha; Luz Maria De-Regil; Faith Thuita; Rebecca Heidkamp; Julia Krasevec; Chika Hayashi; Rafael Flores-Ayala Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 4.022