Annie Ogasawara1, James R Kiefer2, Herman Gill1, Eugene Chiang3, Shravan Sriraman1, Gregory Z Ferl4, James Ziai5, Sandra Sanabria Bohorquez6, Sebastian Guelman7, Xiangdan Wang7, Jihong Yang7, Minh Michael Phan7, Van Nguyen7, Shan Chung7, Christine Yu2, Jeff Tinianow1, Stijn Jan Hein Waaijer1, Alex De Crespigny6, Jan Marik1, C Andrew Boswell4, Tanja Zabka8, Karin Staflin9, Simon-Peter Williams10. 1. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 2. Department of Structural Biology, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 3. Department of Cancer Immunology, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 4. Preclinical and Translational Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 5. Research Pathology, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 6. Oncology Exploratory Clinical Development, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 7. BioAnalytical Sciences, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 8. Safety Assessment Pathology, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 9. Safety Assessment Toxicology, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. 10. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. williams.simon@gene.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: ZED8 is a novel monovalent antibody labeled with zirconium-89 for the molecular imaging of CD8. This work describes nonclinical studies performed in part to provide rationale for and to inform expectations in the early clinical development of ZED8, such as in the studies outlined in clinical trial registry NCT04029181 [1]. METHODS: Surface plasmon resonance, X-ray crystallography, and flow cytometry were used to characterize the ZED8-CD8 binding interaction, its specificity, and its impact on T cell function. Immuno-PET with ZED8 was assessed in huCD8+ tumor-bearing mice and in non-human primates. Plasma antibody levels were measured by ELISA to determine pharmacokinetic parameters, and OLINDA 1.0 was used to estimate radiation dosimetry from image-derived biodistribution data. RESULTS: ZED8 selectively binds to human CD8α at a binding site approximately 9 Å from that of MHCI making mutual interference unlikely. The equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) is 5 nM. ZED8 binds to cynomolgus CD8 with reduced affinity (66 nM) but it has no measurable affinity for rat or mouse CD8. In a series of lymphoma xenografts, ZED8 imaging was able to identify different CD8 levels concordant with flow cytometry. In cynomolgus monkeys with tool compound 89Zr-aCD8v17, lymph nodes were conspicuous by imaging 24 h post-injection, and the pharmacokinetics suggested a flat-fixed first-in-human dose of 4 mg per subject. The whole-body effective dose for an adult human was estimated to be 0.48 mSv/MBq, comparable to existing 89Zr immuno-PET reagents. CONCLUSION: 89Zr immuno-PET with ZED8 appears to be a promising biomarker of tissue CD8 levels suitable for clinical evaluation in cancer patients eligible for immunotherapy.
BACKGROUND: ZED8 is a novel monovalent antibody labeled with zirconium-89 for the molecular imaging of CD8. This work describes nonclinical studies performed in part to provide rationale for and to inform expectations in the early clinical development of ZED8, such as in the studies outlined in clinical trial registry NCT04029181 [1]. METHODS: Surface plasmon resonance, X-ray crystallography, and flow cytometry were used to characterize the ZED8-CD8 binding interaction, its specificity, and its impact on T cell function. Immuno-PET with ZED8 was assessed in huCD8+ tumor-bearing mice and in non-human primates. Plasma antibody levels were measured by ELISA to determine pharmacokinetic parameters, and OLINDA 1.0 was used to estimate radiation dosimetry from image-derived biodistribution data. RESULTS: ZED8 selectively binds to human CD8α at a binding site approximately 9 Å from that of MHCI making mutual interference unlikely. The equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) is 5 nM. ZED8 binds to cynomolgus CD8 with reduced affinity (66 nM) but it has no measurable affinity for rat or mouse CD8. In a series of lymphoma xenografts, ZED8 imaging was able to identify different CD8 levels concordant with flow cytometry. In cynomolgus monkeys with tool compound 89Zr-aCD8v17, lymph nodes were conspicuous by imaging 24 h post-injection, and the pharmacokinetics suggested a flat-fixed first-in-human dose of 4 mg per subject. The whole-body effective dose for an adult human was estimated to be 0.48 mSv/MBq, comparable to existing 89Zr immuno-PET reagents. CONCLUSION: 89Zr immuno-PET with ZED8 appears to be a promising biomarker of tissue CD8 levels suitable for clinical evaluation in cancer patients eligible for immunotherapy.
Authors: Frederike Bensch; Elly L van der Veen; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge; Annelies Jorritsma-Smit; Ronald Boellaard; Iris C Kok; Sjoukje F Oosting; Carolina P Schröder; T Jeroen N Hiltermann; Anthonie J van der Wekken; Harry J M Groen; Thomas C Kwee; Sjoerd G Elias; Jourik A Gietema; Sandra Sanabria Bohorquez; Alex de Crespigny; Simon-Peter Williams; Christoph Mancao; Adrienne H Brouwers; Bernard M Fine; Elisabeth G E de Vries Journal: Nat Med Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Pablo D Roitman; Germán L Farfalli; Miguel A Ayerza; D Luis Múscolo; Federico E Milano; Luis A Aponte-Tinao Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Antoni Ribas; Reinhard Dummer; Igor Puzanov; Ari VanderWalde; Robert H I Andtbacka; Olivier Michielin; Anthony J Olszanski; Josep Malvehy; Jonathan Cebon; Eugenio Fernandez; John M Kirkwood; Thomas F Gajewski; Lisa Chen; Kevin S Gorski; Abraham A Anderson; Scott J Diede; Michael E Lassman; Jennifer Gansert; F Stephen Hodi; Georgina V Long Journal: Cell Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Marco Gerlinger; Andrew J Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Gronroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Charles Swanton; M Math; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron C Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P Andrew Futreal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul C Tumeh; Christina L Harview; Jennifer H Yearley; I Peter Shintaku; Emma J M Taylor; Lidia Robert; Bartosz Chmielowski; Marko Spasic; Gina Henry; Voicu Ciobanu; Alisha N West; Manuel Carmona; Christine Kivork; Elizabeth Seja; Grace Cherry; Antonio J Gutierrez; Tristan R Grogan; Christine Mateus; Gorana Tomasic; John A Glaspy; Ryan O Emerson; Harlan Robins; Robert H Pierce; David A Elashoff; Caroline Robert; Antoni Ribas Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: M Shipitsin; C Small; S Choudhury; E Giladi; S Friedlander; J Nardone; S Hussain; A D Hurley; C Ernst; Y E Huang; H Chang; T P Nifong; D L Rimm; J Dunyak; M Loda; D M Berman; P Blume-Jensen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 7.640