Literature DB >> 36270101

Task-based co-activation patterns reliably predict resting state canonical network engagement during development.

Fengdan Ye1, Robert Kohler1, Bianca Serio1, Sarah Lichenstein1, Sarah W Yip2.   

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental research has traditionally focused on development of individual structures, yet multiple lines of evidence indicate parallel development of large-scale systems, including canonical neural networks (i.e., default mode, frontoparietal). However, the relationship between region- vs. network-level development remains poorly understood. The current study tests the ability of a recently developed multi-task coactivation matrix approach to predict canonical resting state network engagement at baseline and at two-year follow-up in a large and cohort of young adolescents. Pre-processed tabulated neuroimaging data were obtained from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, assessing youth at baseline (N = 6073, age = 10.0 ± 0.6 years, 3056 female) and at two-year follow-up (N = 3539, age = 11.9 ± 0.6 years, 1726 female). Individual multi-task co-activation matrices were constructed from the beta weights of task contrasts from the stop signal task, the monetary incentive delay task, and emotional N-back task. Activation-based predictive modeling, a cross-validated machine learning approach, was adopted to predict resting-state canonical network engagement from multi-task co-activation matrices at baseline. Note that the tabulated data used different parcellations of the task fMRI data ("ASEG" and Desikan) and the resting-state fMRI data (Gordon). Despite this, the model successfully predicted connectivity within the default mode network (DMN, rho = 0.179 ± 0.002, p < 0.001) across participants and identified a subset of co-activations within parietal and occipital macroscale brain regions as key contributors to model performance, suggesting an underlying common brain functional architecture across cognitive domains. Notably, predictive features for resting-state connectivity within the DMN identified at baseline also predicted DMN connectivity at two-year follow-up (rho = 0.258). These results indicate that multi-task co-activation matrices are functionally meaningful and can be used to predict resting-state connectivity. Interestingly, given that predictive features within the co-activation matrices identified at baseline can be extended to predictions at a future time point, our results suggest that task-based neural features and models are valid predictors of resting state network level connectivity across the course of development. Future work is encouraged to verify these findings with more consistent parcellations between task-based and resting-state fMRI, and with longer developmental trajectories.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescence; Co-activation; Cognition; Development; Predictive modeling; Resting-state connectivity

Year:  2022        PMID: 36270101      PMCID: PMC9583448          DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 1878-9293            Impact factor:   5.811


  54 in total

1.  Functional coactivation map of the human brain.

Authors:  Roberto Toro; Peter T Fox; Tomás Paus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Application of Research Domain Criteria to childhood and adolescent impulsive and addictive disorders: Implications for treatment.

Authors:  Sarah W Yip; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-11-09

3.  Longitudinal study of striatal activation to reward and loss anticipation from mid-adolescence into late adolescence/early adulthood.

Authors:  C Lamm; B E Benson; A E Guyer; K Perez-Edgar; N A Fox; D S Pine; M Ernst
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  BrainMap: the social evolution of a human brain mapping database.

Authors:  Angela R Laird; Jack L Lancaster; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2005

5.  Baseline brain function in the preadolescents of the ABCD Study.

Authors:  B Chaarani; S Hahn; N Allgaier; S Adise; M M Owens; A C Juliano; D K Yuan; H Loso; A Ivanciu; M D Albaugh; J Dumas; S Mackey; J Laurent; M Ivanova; D J Hagler; M D Cornejo; S Hatton; A Agrawal; L Aguinaldo; L Ahonen; W Aklin; A P Anokhin; J Arroyo; S Avenevoli; D Babcock; K Bagot; F C Baker; M T Banich; D M Barch; H Bartsch; A Baskin-Sommers; J M Bjork; D Blachman-Demner; M Bloch; R Bogdan; S Y Bookheimer; F Breslin; S Brown; F J Calabro; V Calhoun; B J Casey; L Chang; D B Clark; C Cloak; R T Constable; K Constable; R Corley; L B Cottler; S Coxe; R K Dagher; A M Dale; M Dapretto; R Delcarmen-Wiggins; A S Dick; E K Do; N U F Dosenbach; G J Dowling; S Edwards; T M Ernst; D A Fair; C C Fan; E Feczko; S W Feldstein-Ewing; P Florsheim; J J Foxe; E G Freedman; N P Friedman; S Friedman-Hill; B F Fuemmeler; A Galvan; D G Gee; J Giedd; M Glantz; P Glaser; J Godino; M Gonzalez; R Gonzalez; S Grant; K M Gray; F Haist; M P Harms; S Hawes; A C Heath; S Heeringa; M M Heitzeg; R Hermosillo; M M Herting; J M Hettema; J K Hewitt; C Heyser; E Hoffman; K Howlett; R S Huber; M A Huestis; L W Hyde; W G Iacono; M A Infante; O Irfanoglu; A Isaiah; S Iyengar; J Jacobus; R James; B Jean-Francois; T Jernigan; N R Karcher; A Kaufman; B Kelley; B Kit; A Ksinan; J Kuperman; A R Laird; C Larson; K LeBlanc; C Lessov-Schlagger; N Lever; D A Lewis; K Lisdahl; A R Little; M Lopez; M Luciana; B Luna; P A Madden; H H Maes; C Makowski; A T Marshall; M J Mason; J Matochik; B D McCandliss; E McGlade; I Montoya; G Morgan; A Morris; C Mulford; P Murray; B J Nagel; M C Neale; G Neigh; A Nencka; A Noronha; S J Nixon; C E Palmer; V Pariyadath; M P Paulus; W E Pelham; D Pfefferbaum; C Pierpaoli; A Prescot; D Prouty; L I Puttler; N Rajapaske; K M Rapuano; G Reeves; P F Renshaw; M C Riedel; P Rojas; M de la Rosa; M D Rosenberg; M J Ross; M Sanchez; C Schirda; D Schloesser; J Schulenberg; K J Sher; C Sheth; P D Shilling; W K Simmons; E R Sowell; N Speer; M Spittel; L M Squeglia; C Sripada; J Steinberg; C Striley; M T Sutherland; J Tanabe; S F Tapert; W Thompson; R L Tomko; K A Uban; S Vrieze; N E Wade; R Watts; S Weiss; B A Wiens; O D Williams; A Wilbur; D Wing; D Wolff-Hughes; R Yang; D A Yurgelun-Todd; R A Zucker; A Potter; H P Garavan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Adolescent neurocognitive development and impacts of substance use: Overview of the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) baseline neurocognition battery.

Authors:  M Luciana; J M Bjork; B J Nagel; D M Barch; R Gonzalez; S J Nixon; M T Banich
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.464

7.  Co-activation patterns across multiple tasks reveal robust anti-correlated functional networks.

Authors:  Meiling Li; Louisa Dahmani; Danhong Wang; Jianxun Ren; Sophia Stocklein; Yuanxiang Lin; Guoming Luan; Zhiqiang Zhang; Guangming Lu; Fanziska Galiè; Ying Han; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Meiyun Wang; Michael D Fox; Hesheng Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; George F Koob; Robert T Croyle; Diana W Bianchi; Joshua A Gordon; Walter J Koroshetz; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; William T Riley; Michele H Bloch; Kevin Conway; Bethany G Deeds; Gayathri J Dowling; Steven Grant; Katia D Howlett; John A Matochik; Glen D Morgan; Margaret M Murray; Antonio Noronha; Catherine Y Spong; Eric M Wargo; Kenneth R Warren; Susan R B Weiss
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.464

9.  Dissociable neural substrates of opioid and cocaine use identified via connectome-based modelling.

Authors:  Sarah D Lichenstein; Dustin Scheinost; Marc N Potenza; Kathleen M Carroll; Sarah W Yip
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 10.  The frontoparietal network: function, electrophysiology, and importance of individual precision mapping.

Authors:  Scott Marek; Nico U F Dosenbach
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.