Literature DB >> 36269787

Associations of maximum and reactive strength indicators with force-velocity profiles obtained from squat jump and countermovement jump.

Takuya Nishioka1, Junichi Okada2.   

Abstract

Understanding the properties associated with the vertical force-velocity (F-v) profiles is important for maximizing jump performance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations of maximum and reactive strength indicators with the F-v profiles obtained from squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ). On the first day, 20 resistance-trained men underwent measurements for half squat (HSQ) one-repetition maximum (1RM). On the second day, jump performances were measured to calculate the drop jump (DJ) reactive strength index (RSI) and the parameters of F-v profiles (theoretical maximum force [F0], velocity [V0], power [Pmax], and slope of the linear F-v relationship [SFv]) obtained from SJ and CMJ. The DJ RSI was not significantly correlated with any parameter of the vertical F-v profiles, whereas the relative HSQ 1RM was significantly correlated with the SJ F0 (r = 0.508, p = 0.022), CMJ F0 (r = 0.499, p = 0.025), SJ SFv (r = -0.457, p = 0.043), and CMJ Pmax (r = 0.493, p = 0.027). These results suggest that maximum strength is a more important indicator than reactive strength in improving vertical F-v profiles. Furthermore, the importance of maximum strength may vary depending on whether the practitioner wants to maximize the performance of SJ or CMJ.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36269787      PMCID: PMC9586393          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  42 in total

1.  Relationships Between Concentric and Eccentric Strength and Countermovement Jump Performance in Resistance Trained Men.

Authors:  Lee A Bridgeman; Michael R McGuigan; Nicholas D Gill; Deborah K Dulson
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Reliability of measures obtained during single and repeated countermovement jumps.

Authors:  Stuart J Cormack; Robert U Newton; Michael R McGuigan; Tim L A Doyle
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.010

3.  Development of a criterion method to determine peak mechanical power output in a countermovement jump.

Authors:  Nick J Owen; James Watkins; Liam P Kilduff; Huw R Bevan; Mark A Bennett
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Force-velocity profile: imbalance determination and effect on lower limb ballistic performance.

Authors:  P Samozino; P Edouard; S Sangnier; M Brughelli; P Gimenez; J-B Morin
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Biomechanical Factors Associated With Jump Height: A Comparison of Cross-Sectional and Pre-to-Posttraining Change Findings.

Authors:  Brendan M Marshall; Kieran A Moran
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

7.  Eccentric utilization ratio: effect of sport and phase of training.

Authors:  Michael R McGuigan; Timothy L A Doyle; Michael Newton; Dylan J Edwards; Sophia Nimphius; Robert U Newton
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Where does the One-Repetition Maximum Exist on the Force-Velocity Relationship in Squat?

Authors:  Jean Romain Rivière; Jérémy Rossi; Pedro Jimenez-Reyes; Jean-Benoit Morin; Pierre Samozino
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.118

9.  Kinetics in lumbosacral and lower-limb joints of sprinters during barbell hip thrust compared to deadlift and back squat.

Authors:  Mitsuo Otsuka; Toyoyuki Honjo; Akinori Nagano; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.