Literature DB >> 36269492

Report on an Italian survey of 72 stuck hemodialysis catheters.

Giacomo Forneris1, Daniele Savio2, Pietro Quaretti3, Massimo Lodi4, Simone Comelli5, Walter Morale6, Monica Spina7, Luca Di Maggio2, Marina Cornacchiari8, Massimo Punzi9, Giuseppe Gatta10, Pasqualina Cecere11, Marco Pozzato11, Antonio Marciello12, Dario Roccatello11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports of stuck hemodialysis catheters have been on the rise in recent years. Aim of this work is to report how this complication has been managed and the relative outcomes in a multicente Italian survey.
METHODS: Since 2012, the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN) Project Group of Vascular Access has collected data among nephrologists on this complication. Data regarding 72 cases of stuck tunnelled central venous catheter (tCVC) in 72 patients were retrieved thanks to this survey.
RESULTS: In 11 patients (15%) the stuck catheter was directly buried or left in place. Sixty-one cases were managed through advanced removal techniques. Among these, 47 (77%) stuck tunnelled central venous catheters were successfully removed, while 14 (23%) failed to be withdrawn. Considering removed tCVCs, the use of endoluminal balloon dilatation alone or in combination with other tools showed a percentage of success of 88%. The removal procedure involved numerous specialists. Some complications occurred, such as breakage of the line or bleeding, and two cases of haemopericardium during an advanced procedure.
CONCLUSION: The survey shows how the stuck catheter complication was managed in different ways, with conflicting results. When utilized, endoluminal balloon dilatation proved to be the most effective and most often utilized technique, while some cases had suboptimal management or failure. This underlines how delicate the procedure is, and the need for both precise knowledge of this complication and timely organization of removal attempts.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Italian Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embedded; Haemodialysis; Retention; Stuck catheter; Tunnelled catheters; Vascular access

Year:  2022        PMID: 36269492     DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01474-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nephrol        ISSN: 1121-8428            Impact factor:   4.393


  4 in total

1.  Use of vascular access for haemodialysis in Europe: a report from the ERA-EDTA Registry.

Authors:  Marlies Noordzij; Kitty J Jager; Sabine N van der Veer; Reinhard Kramar; Frederic Collart; James G Heaf; Olivera Stojceva-Taneva; Torbjørn Leivestad; Jadranka Buturovic-Ponikvar; Manuel Benítez Sánchez; Fransesc Moreso; Karl G Prütz; Alison Severn; Christoph Wanner; Raymond Vanholder; Pietro Ravani
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Mechanics of a stuck central venous catheter removal.

Authors:  Olajire Idowu; Jessica Brown; Subin Kim; Sunghoon Kim
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  International Differences in the Location and Use of Arteriovenous Accesses Created for Hemodialysis: Results From the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

Authors:  Ronald L Pisoni; Lindsay Zepel; Richard Fluck; Charmaine E Lok; Hideki Kawanishi; Gültekin Süleymanlar; Haimanot Wasse; Francesca Tentori; Jarcy Zee; Yun Li; Douglas Schaubel; Steven Burke; Bruce Robinson
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Endoluminal dilatation for embedded hemodialysis catheters: A case-control study of factors associated with embedding and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Hari Talreja; Stephen Edward Ryan; Janet Graham; Manish M Sood; Adnan Hadziomerovic; Edward Clark; Swapnil Hiremath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.