| Literature DB >> 36269451 |
Ashish K Khanna1,2,3, Lillian Nosow4, Lauren Sands5, Amit K Saha6,7, Harshavardhan Agashe8, Lynnette Harris6,7, R Shayn Martin9, Bryan Marchant10.
Abstract
We sought to assess agreement of cardiac output estimation between continuous pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) guided thermodilution (CO-CTD) and a novel pulse wave analysis (PWA) method that performs an analysis of multiple beats of the arterial blood pressure waveform (CO-MBA) in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. PAC obtained CO-CTD measurements were compared with CO-MBA measurements from the Argos monitor (Retia Medical; Valhalla, NY, USA), in prospectively enrolled adult cardiac surgical intensive care unit patients. Agreement was assessed via Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed on data segments identified as arrhythmia, or with low CO (less than 5 L/min). 927 hours of monitoring data from 79 patients was analyzed, of which 26 had arrhythmia. Mean CO-CTD was 5.29 ± 1.14 L/min (bias ± precision), whereas mean CO-MBA was 5.36 ± 1.33 L/min, (4.95 ± 0.80 L/min and 5.04 ± 1.07 L/min in the arrhythmia subgroup). Mean of differences was 0.04 ± 1.04 L/min with an error of 38.2%. In the arrhythmia subgroup, mean of differences was 0.14 ± 0.90 L/min with an error of 35.4%. In the low CO subgroup, mean of differences was 0.26 ± 0.89 L/min with an error of 40.4%. In adult patients after cardiac surgery, including those with low cardiac output and arrhythmia CO-MBA is not interchangeable with the continuous thermodilution method via a PAC, when using a 30% error threshold.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac output; Cardiac surgery; Hemodynamics; Intensive care unit; Monitoring; Post-operative; Pulse wave analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36269451 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00924-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Monit Comput ISSN: 1387-1307 Impact factor: 1.977