Literature DB >> 36269451

Agreement between cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of arterial blood pressure waveforms and continuous thermodilution in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients.

Ashish K Khanna1,2,3, Lillian Nosow4, Lauren Sands5, Amit K Saha6,7, Harshavardhan Agashe8, Lynnette Harris6,7, R Shayn Martin9, Bryan Marchant10.   

Abstract

We sought to assess agreement of cardiac output estimation between continuous pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) guided thermodilution (CO-CTD) and a novel pulse wave analysis (PWA) method that performs an analysis of multiple beats of the arterial blood pressure waveform (CO-MBA) in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. PAC obtained CO-CTD measurements were compared with CO-MBA measurements from the Argos monitor (Retia Medical; Valhalla, NY, USA), in prospectively enrolled adult cardiac surgical intensive care unit patients. Agreement was assessed via Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed on data segments identified as arrhythmia, or with low CO (less than 5 L/min). 927 hours of monitoring data from 79 patients was analyzed, of which 26 had arrhythmia. Mean CO-CTD was 5.29 ± 1.14 L/min (bias ± precision), whereas mean CO-MBA was 5.36 ± 1.33 L/min, (4.95 ± 0.80 L/min and 5.04 ± 1.07 L/min in the arrhythmia subgroup). Mean of differences was 0.04 ± 1.04 L/min with an error of 38.2%. In the arrhythmia subgroup, mean of differences was 0.14 ± 0.90 L/min with an error of 35.4%. In the low CO subgroup, mean of differences was 0.26 ± 0.89 L/min with an error of 40.4%. In adult patients after cardiac surgery, including those with low cardiac output and arrhythmia CO-MBA is not interchangeable with the continuous thermodilution method via a PAC, when using a 30% error threshold.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Cardiac surgery; Hemodynamics; Intensive care unit; Monitoring; Post-operative; Pulse wave analysis

Year:  2022        PMID: 36269451     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00924-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   1.977


  18 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Mark A Hamilton; Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution: a method comparison study in patients treated in the intensive care unit after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Gillis Greiwe; Valerie Peters; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Stefano Romagnoli; Mathias Kubik; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Cardiac output estimation using pulse wave analysis-physiology, algorithms, and technologies: a narrative review.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Kouz; Thomas W L Scheeren; Gillis Greiwe; Phillip Hoppe; Stefano Romagnoli; Daniel de Backer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Is There a Need for a Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Cardiac Surgery Today?

Authors:  Ehud Jacobzon; Tal Hasin; Avital Lifschitz; Naama Bogot; Adam Farkash; Salis Tager; Shuli Silberman
Journal:  Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2020-08-26

6.  Current use of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery: a survey study.

Authors:  Onkar Judge; Fuhai Ji; Neal Fleming; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 7.  Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Philip J Peyton; Simon W Chong
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Continuous cardiac output monitoring in humans by invasive and noninvasive peripheral blood pressure waveform analysis.

Authors:  Zhenwei Lu; Ramakrishna Mukkamala
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-08

9.  Agreement between continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karim Kouz; Frederic Michard; Alina Bergholz; Christina Vokuhl; Luisa Briesenick; Phillip Hoppe; Moritz Flick; Gerhard Schön; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.

Authors:  Sujanthy S Rajaram; Nayan K Desai; Ankur Kalra; Mithil Gajera; Susan K Cavanaugh; William Brampton; Duncan Young; Sheila Harvey; Kathy Rowan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.