Literature DB >> 3626897

Factors underlying performance on written tests of knowledge.

G R Norman, E K Smith, A C Powles, P J Rooney, N L Henry, P E Dodd.   

Abstract

The study compares two popular forms of written tests; the multiple choice test (MCQ) and the Modified Essay Question (MEQ). Two factors were varied in the experiment: the format of the questions (multiple choice, directed free response, or open-ended free response) and the context of the questions (in a patient problem or in random sequence). Six problems were developed in each version, and administered to a total of 36 medical students at three educational levels using a Latin-square design. The results showed a significant effect of each factor in the design, amounting to a difference of 8.7% between MCQ and directed free response, 4.2% between directed and open-ended free response and 4.3% between problem and random context. However, the correlation of scores based on content across the formats approached unity after correction for attenuation. A process score, based on the style and presentation in the undirected format, correlated more strongly with the free-response questions. The results suggest that, although the MCQ and MEQ may assess different skills, there is a very strong relationship between content scores derived from the two formats. The free response formats may present the opportunity for assessment of other factors related to presentation if scoring procedures are modified. Finally, the effect of randomizing questions is a deterioration of performance when compared to placing questions in the problem context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3626897     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00367.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  4 in total

Review 1.  Using computers for assessment in medicine.

Authors:  Peter Cantillon; Bill Irish; David Sales
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-11

2.  The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.

Authors:  C P Van Der Vleuten
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.853

Review 3.  Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?

Authors:  Richard J Hift
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Assessment formats in dental medicine: An overview.

Authors:  Susanne Gerhard-Szep; Arndt Güntsch; Peter Pospiech; Andreas Söhnel; Petra Scheutzel; Torsten Wassmann; Tugba Zahn
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.