| Literature DB >> 36268307 |
Eko Setiawan1,2, Bambang Purwanto3,4, Brian Wasita3,5, Agung Putra6,7,8.
Abstract
Background: Duodenal perforation is considered as one of gastrointestinal emergency with high morbidity and mortality rate. The MSCs have the ability to improve wound healing by releasing several growth factors and anti-inflammatory cytokines to promote the angiogenesis process. This study aimed to investigate the role of MSCs in duodenal perforation wound healing.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis; CD31; Duodenal perforation; MSCs; VEGF
Year: 2022 PMID: 36268307 PMCID: PMC9577437 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) ISSN: 2049-0801
Fig. 1MSCs morphology with 90% confluency showed spindle-like cells (×200 magnification).
Fig. 2MSCs differentiation test using osteogenic and adipogenic culture media (×200 magnification. A: The brown staining indicates the presence of fat deposits in the culture that has been induced with adipogenic culture medium.; B: The red staining represents the result of post-cultured calcium deposits with osteogenic culture media. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Flowcytometry analysis of CD90, CD29, CD45, and CD31 expression.
Fig. 4VEGF expression in duodenum in various study groups using Western blot. Thick band intensity showed an increase in VEGF expression with significant difference between control and treatment groups. There is also significant difference in VEGF level between T1 and T2 groups (p < 0.05).
Fig. 5Expression of CD31 in duodenum tissue of various study groups using immunohistochemical methods (×400 magnification). CD31 expression is shown as brown colorization. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 6Quantification of CD31 staining showed significant difference between MSCs and control group. There is also significant difference in CD31 expresssion between T1 and T2 groups (p < 0.05).