Literature DB >> 36268257

One- versus two-stage partial hepatectomy for large resectable solitary hepatocellular carcinomas determined preoperatively to have a narrow resection margin: a propensity score matching analysis.

Yao Li1, Peng-Peng Li1, Da-Peng Sun1, Jun-Sheng Ni1, Wan Yee Lau1,2, Gang Huang1, Wei-Ping Zhou1,3,4, Hui Liu1, Ze-Ya Pan1, Yuan Yang1, Ling-Hao Zhao1.   

Abstract

Background: For patients with a large but resectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of >5 cm in diameter, it is often difficult to achieve a sufficient resection margin. There is still no study on whether a two-stage hepatectomy to increase a narrow resection margin would be beneficial.
Methods: From August 2014 to February 2017, patients with a large but resectable solitary HCC of >5 cm and a preoperative estimated resection margin of <1.0 cm were retrospectively studied. They were divided into one- and two-stage resection groups. A retrospective analysis was performed, followed by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Disease recurrence, survival, intraoperative and postoperative data were compared.
Results: Before PSM, the 1-, 2-, 3-and 4-year recurrence-free survival rates for the one- and two-stage groups were 44.3%, 31.7%, 24.3%, 19.2% versus 60.6%, 45.4%, 43.5%, 32.3%, respectively (P=0.007). The corresponding OS rates were 61.0%, 45.2%, 43.8%, 38.4% versus 69.6%, 62.5%, 60.7%, 57.3%, respectively (P=0.029). After PSM, the 1-, 2-, 3-and 4-year recurrence-free survival rates for the one- and two-stage groups were 44.0%, 31.5%, 27.3%, 21.0% versus 60.6%, 45.4%, 43.5%, 32.3%, respectively (P=0.013). The corresponding OS rates were 62.5%, 41.1%, 41.1%, 37.5% versus 69.6%, 62.5%, 60.7%, 57.3%, respectively (P=0.038). Differences in the resection margins between the one- and two-stage groups before [0.3 (0-0.5) versus 1.2 (0.8-2.2) cm] and after [0.2 (0-0.5) versus 1.2 (0.8-2.2) cm] PSM were also significant. Conclusions: Two-stage hepatectomy allowed a wider resection margin for patients with a resectable but solitary HCC of >5 cm, and resulted in significantly better long-term survival outcomes after partial hepatectomy. 2022 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  One-stage hepatectomy; large solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); resection margin; two-stage hepatectomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36268257      PMCID: PMC9577985          DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-20-711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr        ISSN: 2304-3881            Impact factor:   8.265


  35 in total

1.  Temporary portal vein embolization as a starter of liver regeneration.

Authors:  Mickael Lesurtel; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  Improved hypertrophy of future remnant liver after portal vein embolization with plugs, coils and particles.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Maciej Malinowski; Maciej-Janusz Powerski; Joost Wüstefeld; Victoria Heller; Timm Denecke; Martin Stockmann; Bernhard Gebauer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Outcomes of hepatic resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (≥ 10 cm in diameter).

Authors:  Yo-ichi Yamashita; Akinobu Taketomi; Ken Shirabe; Shinichi Aishima; Eiji Tsuijita; Kazutoyo Morita; Hiroto Kayashima; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Long-term survival after surgical resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with transarterial chemoembolization after propensity score matching.

Authors:  Yang Won Min; Jun Hee Lee; Geum-Youn Gwak; Yong Han Paik; Joon Hyoek Lee; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Kwang Cheol Koh; Seung Woon Paik; Byung Chul Yoo; Moon Seok Choi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.029

5.  Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings.

Authors:  Andreas A Schnitzbauer; Sven A Lang; Holger Goessmann; Silvio Nadalin; Janine Baumgart; Stefan A Farkas; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl; Thomas Lorf; Armin Goralcyk; Rüdiger Hörbelt; Alexander Kroemer; Martin Loss; Petra Rümmele; Marcus N Scherer; Winfried Padberg; Alfred Königsrainer; Hauke Lang; Aiman Obed; Hans J Schlitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Prognostic factors affecting long term outcome after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: results in a series of 100 Italian patients.

Authors:  M Lise; S Bacchetti; P Da Pian; D Nitti; P L Pilati; P Pigato
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Does the margin width influence recurrence rate in liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma smaller than 5 cm?

Authors:  C Lazzara; G Navarra; S Lazzara; A Barbera; C Saitta; G Raimondo; S Latteri; G Currò
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.507

8.  Incidence and factors associated with intrahepatic recurrence following resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  N Nagasue; M Uchida; Y Makino; Y Takemoto; A Yamanoi; T Hayashi; Y C Chang; H Kohno; T Nakamura; H Yukaya
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results and prognostic factors in 235 Western patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Gisèle N'Kontchou; Amel Mahamoudi; Mounir Aout; Nathalie Ganne-Carrié; Véronique Grando; Emmanuelle Coderc; Eric Vicaut; Jean Claude Trinchet; Nicolas Sellier; Michel Beaugrand; Olivier Seror
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Importance of surgical margin in the outcomes of hepatocholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ka Wing Ma; Kenneth Siu Ho Chok
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.