| Literature DB >> 36268227 |
Jichan Shi1, Wenjie Wu2, Kang Wu2, Chaorong Ni3, Guiqing He1, Shilin Zheng1, Fang Cheng1, Yaxing Yi2, Ruotong Ren2,4, Xiangao Jiang1.
Abstract
Leptospirosis is a zoonotic infection caused by the pathogenic Leptospira. Leptospirosis is transmitted mainly through contact with contaminated rivers, lakes, or animals carrying Leptospira. Human leptospirosis has a wide range of non-specific clinical manifestations ranging from fever, hypotension, and myalgia to multi-organ dysfunction, which severely hampers the timely clinical diagnosis and treatment of leptospirosis. Therefore, there is an urgent clinical need for an efficient strategy/method that can be used for the accurate diagnosis of leptospirosis, especially in critically ill patients. Here, we report a case of a 75-year-old male patient with clinical presentation of fever, cough, and diarrhea. Initial laboratory tests and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest suggested only tuberculosis. The patient was finally diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) combined with leptospirosis by sputum Xpert MTB RIF, epidemiological investigations, and delayed serological testing. Furthermore, through metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of clinical samples of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), urine, plasma and sputum, the causative pathogens were identified as Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and Leptospira spp. With specific treatment for both leptospirosis and tuberculosis, and associated supportive care (e.g., hemodialysis), the patient showed a good prognosis. This case report suggests that mNGS can generate a useful complement to conventional pathogenic diagnostic methods through more detailed etiological screening (i.e., at the level of species or species complex).Entities:
Keywords: co-infection; early diagnosis; leptospirosis; mNGs; pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB)
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36268227 PMCID: PMC9577070 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.922996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Figure 1Chest CT of the patient. (A) The chest CT prior to admission showing high-density patchy and streak-like shadows in the lung, with unclear margin. (B) The chest CT of day 4 showing enhanced patchy and nodular high-density shadows in the lung, associated with diffused ground-glass opacities. (C) The chest CT of day 6 showing the relief of the patchy high-density shadow. (D) The chest CT of day 13 showing the absorption of the patchy high-density shadow.
Laboratory results.
| Hospitalized date | WBCa(×109/L) | HBa(g/L) | ALBa(g/L) | PLTa(×109/L) | CRPa (mg/L) | PCTa(μg/L) | PTa(s) | TBiLa(μmol/L) | Cra(μmol/L) | LDHa(U/L) | CKa(U/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 (17 November 2021)b | 11.43 | 88 | 26.6 | 86 | 165.5 | 89.87 | 14.8 | 22.1 | 464 | 352 | 464 |
| Day 2 | 8.0 | 77 | 20.7 | 71 | 154.1 | 85.64 | 14.1 | 9.2 | 574 | 356 | 424 |
| Day 3c | 9.9 | 99 | 26 | 96 | 161.1 | 29.06 | 14.9 | 10.6 | 342 | 557 | 212 |
| Day 4 | 14.7 | 99 | 27.7 | 134 | 130.9 | 13.6 | 13.6 | 18.2 | 176 | 704 | 245 |
| Day 6d | 6.9 | 72 | 21.3 | 154 | 43.2 | 3.81 | 13.4 | 8.0 | 398 | 612 | 458 |
| Day 9 | 6.2 | 66 | 24.1 | 231 | 10.8 | 1.19 | 12.4 | 7.9 | 185 | 493 | 138 |
| Day 11 | 6.6 | 65 | 24.8 | 247 | 6.8 | 0.69 | 12.2 | 7.8 | 151 | 454 | 77 |
| Day 14 | 6.4 | 67 | 26.5 | 235 | 2.3 | 0.45 | 11.3 | 6.4 | 106 | 286 | 78 |
| Day 21 | 4.1 | 70 | 28.5 | 119 | 12.7 | – | – | 5.3 | 91 | – | – |
aWBC, white blood cells; HB, hemoglobin; ALB, albumin; PLT, platelets; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; PT, prothrombin time; TBil, total bilirubin; Cr, creatinine; LDH, lactic dehydrogenase; CK, creatine kinase. bThe day of admission was defined as day 1. cThe day performing Xpert MTB RIF (positive). dThe day obtaining the mNGS result of CSF, urine, and plasma (the mNGS result of sputum was obtained on day 8).
Pathogens detected by mNGS.
| Sample type | Genus | Species | Number of reads | RPMd | Relative abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSFa | Leptospira |
| 4 | 0.3 | 0.07 |
| Urine | Leptospira |
| 9 | 0.74 | 0.06 |
| Sputum | Mycobacterium | MTBCb | 4 | 0.26 | < 0.01 |
| Plasmac | Leptospira |
| 2 | 0.06 | 4.65 |
aCSF, cerebrospinal fluid. bMTBC, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (the mNGS pipeline reports the species group (i.e., MTBC) rather than the detailed species due to their high homology). cCell-free DNA was used for metagenomic next-generation sequencing. dRPM, reads per million mapped reads.
Figure 2Clinical course of the patient during hospitalization. The schematic shows the timeline from the onset of symptoms (11 November 2021) to transferring to the general ward (29 November). Major events, including diagnostics, manifestations, and medication during the course, are indicated. Sample collection for diagnostics is indicated in yellow, and the dates of corresponding reports available are shown in blue. Diagnostic examinations used for pathogen identification are highlighted by purple arrows. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; Pl, plasma; U, urine; Pip.-Taz., Piperacillin sodium and tazobactam sodium for injection; Lev., Levofloxacin hydrochloride injection; Sul., sulperazone; Mox., moxifloxacin hydrochloride and sodium chloride injection; Met., methylprednisolone; Rif., rifampicin; Iso., isoniazid; Eth., ethambutol; Pyr., pyrazinamide; Pen., penicillin.