| Literature DB >> 36268160 |
Abstract
The rationality and timeliness of the comprehensive results of English course learning quality are increasingly important in the process of modern education. There are some problems in the scientific evaluation of English course learning quality and teachers' own English course learning, such as the need for proper adjustment and improvement. Based on the improved network theory of genetic algorithm, this paper takes an online English course learning quality evaluation model and uses MATLAB 7.0 to write the graphical user interface of the neural set network English course learning quality prediction model. The model uses the genetic algorithm of adaptive mutation to optimize the initial weights and values of the neural set network and solves the problems of prediction accuracy and convergence speed of English course learning quality evaluation results. Simulation experiments show that the neural set network has a strong dependence on the initial weights and thresholds. Using the improved genetic algorithm to optimize the initial weights and thresholds of the neural set network reduced the time for the neural set network to find the weights and thresholds that meet the training termination conditions, the prediction accuracy was increased to 0.897, the prediction accuracy was 78.85%, and the level prediction accuracy was 84.62%, which effectively promoted the development of online English course learning in colleges and the continuous improvement of teachers' English course learning level.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36268160 PMCID: PMC9578836 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7281892
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Comparison of English course learning accuracy of genetic algorithm.
Figure 2Iterative design process of online English course learning.
Optimal parameter distribution of neural set network.
| Serial number | Network accuracy | Index system | Evaluation model | Problem-solving ability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.24 | 1.3 | 1.36 | 1.42 |
| 2 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.77 |
| 3 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| 4 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.47 | 0.53 |
| 5 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.08 | 1.18 |
| 6 | 1.41 | 1.55 | 1.69 | 1.83 |
Figure 3Iterative accuracy analysis of the new solution of the neural set network solution space.
Figure 4Three-dimensional analysis of online English course learning quality factors.
High-precision fitting of English course learning samples.
| Training samples | Mean squared error (%) | Squared error (%) | Theoretical calculations | Quality of the training | Connection weights (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V 1 | 24.09346 | 53.15309 | Redistribute their search location | Variation factor | 16.09678 |
| V 2 | 25.43208 | 54.77281 | The distance between two particles | Comprehensibility of the model | 16.03368 |
| V 3 | 25.68576 | 55.07977 | An improved particle | Swarm algorithm | 16.55782 |
| V 4 | 25.17601 | 54.46297 | Increasing the current | Critical value | 17.64163 |
| V 5 | 24.27066 | 53.3675 | A predetermined threshold | Local convergence | 19.13484 |
Figure 5Neural set network hierarchy topology under genetic algorithm.
Iterative realization of genetic algorithm in neural set network.
| Code number | Genetic algorithm in neural set network | Text content |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Slices are suitable for | #include <algorithm> |
| 2 |
| #include <functional> |
| 3 | During the day | Using namespace std; |
| 4 | The set of sin | Sort (a, a + 5, less <int>()); |
| 5 | lim | Sort (a, a + 5, greater <int>()); |
| 6 | A total of | Template <class T> inline int |
| 7 | Each experiment was | Int a = {1, 4, 3, −13734, 1e3}; |
| 8 |
| Qsort (a, 5, Greater <int>); |
| 9 | The neural set network is | Qsort (a, 5, Less <int>); |
| 10 | Which the | Fill (a, a + 105, 0); |
| 11 | The initial weight of | Fill (a, a + 105, 0x7fffffff) |
| 12 |
| #include <cstring> |
| 13 | The neural set network in table | Char s1 = “Hello,” “World;” |
| 14 | All | Using namespace std; |
| 15 | In the model of g | String s1, s2 = “World;” |
| 16 | The maximum number | Freopen (“in.in,” “r,” stdin); |
| 17 | Unconventional English course learning | Freopen (“out.out,” “w,” stdout); |
| 18 | Parameters of the learning rate | Fclose (stdin); fclose (stdout); |
| 19 | Refer to | Fprintf (out, “%d,” a); |
Figure 6The distribution of the output value of the output layer of the neural set network.
Figure 7Systematic English course learning quality mapping under the constraint of neural set network.
Figure 8Radar chart of English course learning resource index evaluation.