Valarie McMurtry1, Jane M Poretta2, Rachel E Factor3. 1. University of Utah, Department of Pathology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States. 2. University of Utah, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States. 3. Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Abstract
Context: Telepathology is a digital, microscope-independent method of diagnosing pathology from scanned slides. Frozen sections (FS) can be performed and read by a pathologist at any site. At our institution, telepathology is used for diagnosis of frozen sections of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy and are enrolled in a clinical trial. Objective: We investigated the accuracy of diagnosing SLN frozen sections in the neoadjuvant setting using telepathology. Design: SLN were entirely submitted for frozen section. A pathology assistant prepared the frozen and scanned the slides using VisionTek M6 digital microscope ecosystem (East Dundee, IL). Cases were interpreted by trained, board-certified pathologists. All frozen sections remnants were submitted for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded permanent sections. Frozen section diagnoses using telepathology were compared to final pathology. Turn-around time from specimen collection to frozen section diagnosis was recorded. Results: 54 SLN from 22 breast neoadjuvant cases were diagnosed via telepathology from March 2017 to July 2019. 95% of SLNs interpreted as negative on frozen section and on permanents. A definitive diagnosis could not be rendered on six SLNs; diagnosed "atypical" at frozen. Sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 100% respectively with accuracy of 95.8%. The false-negative rate was 5%. There were no false positives. The average turn-around time was over an hour. Conclusions: Telepathology is an accurate method of diagnosing SLN frozen sections in the neoadjuvant setting, but lobular carcinomas and treatment effect pose diagnostic challenges and the time to report results is increased compared to standard microscopy.
Context: Telepathology is a digital, microscope-independent method of diagnosing pathology from scanned slides. Frozen sections (FS) can be performed and read by a pathologist at any site. At our institution, telepathology is used for diagnosis of frozen sections of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy and are enrolled in a clinical trial. Objective: We investigated the accuracy of diagnosing SLN frozen sections in the neoadjuvant setting using telepathology. Design: SLN were entirely submitted for frozen section. A pathology assistant prepared the frozen and scanned the slides using VisionTek M6 digital microscope ecosystem (East Dundee, IL). Cases were interpreted by trained, board-certified pathologists. All frozen sections remnants were submitted for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded permanent sections. Frozen section diagnoses using telepathology were compared to final pathology. Turn-around time from specimen collection to frozen section diagnosis was recorded. Results: 54 SLN from 22 breast neoadjuvant cases were diagnosed via telepathology from March 2017 to July 2019. 95% of SLNs interpreted as negative on frozen section and on permanents. A definitive diagnosis could not be rendered on six SLNs; diagnosed "atypical" at frozen. Sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 100% respectively with accuracy of 95.8%. The false-negative rate was 5%. There were no false positives. The average turn-around time was over an hour. Conclusions: Telepathology is an accurate method of diagnosing SLN frozen sections in the neoadjuvant setting, but lobular carcinomas and treatment effect pose diagnostic challenges and the time to report results is increased compared to standard microscopy.
Authors: Jean-Francois Boileau; Brigitte Poirier; Mark Basik; Claire M B Holloway; Louis Gaboury; Lucas Sideris; Sarkis Meterissian; Angel Arnaout; Muriel Brackstone; David R McCready; Stephen E Karp; Isabelle Trop; Andre Lisbona; Frances C Wright; Rami J Younan; Louise Provencher; Erica Patocskai; Atilla Omeroglu; Andre Robidoux Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alexandra S Brown; Kelly K Hunt; Jeannie Shen; Lei Huo; Gildy V Babiera; Merrick I Ross; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Barry W Feig; Henry M Kuerer; Judy C Boughey; Christine D Ching; Michael Z Gilcrease Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: G Canavese; A Catturich; C Vecchio; D Tomei; M Gipponi; G Villa; F Carli; P Bruzzi; B Dozin Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Armando E Giuliano; Karla V Ballman; Linda McCall; Peter D Beitsch; Meghan B Brennan; Pond R Kelemen; David W Ollila; Nora M Hansen; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Kelly K Hunt; Monica Morrow Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Judy C Boughey; Karla V Ballman; Huong T Le-Petross; Linda M McCall; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; Eric C Feliberti; Kelly K Hunt Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 12.969