Literature DB >> 36268089

A performance evaluation study: Variant annotation tools - the enigma of clinical next generation sequencing (NGS) based genetic testing.

Sachleen Tuteja1, Sabah Kadri2,3, Kai Lee Yap2,3.   

Abstract

Dramatically expanding our ability for clinical genetic testing for inherited conditions and complex diseases such as cancer, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are allowing for rapid interrogation of thousands of genes and identification of millions of variants. Variant annotation, the process of assigning functional information to DNA variants based on the standardized Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) nomenclature, is a fundamental challenge in the analysis of NGS data that has led to the development of many bioinformatic algorithms. In this study, we evaluated the performance of 3 variant annotation tools: Alamut® Batch, Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP), and ANNOVAR, benchmarked by a manually curated ground-truth set of 298 variants from the medical exome database at the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory at Lurie Children's Hospital. Of the 3 tools, VEP produces the most accurate variant annotations (HGVS nomenclature for 297 of the 298 variants) due to usage of updated gene transcript versions within the algorithm. Alamut® Batch called 296 of the 298 variants correctly; strikingly, ANNOVAR exhibited the greatest number of discrepancies (20 of the 298 variants, 93.3% concordance with ground-truth set). Adoption of validated methods of variant annotation is critical in post-analytical phases of clinical testing.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANNOVAR; Alamut®; Gene panel; Genetic testing; VEP; Variant annotation

Year:  2022        PMID: 36268089      PMCID: PMC9577137          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol Inform


  35 in total

1.  Improving sequence variant descriptions in mutation databases and literature using the Mutalyzer sequence variation nomenclature checker.

Authors:  Martin Wildeman; Ernest van Ophuizen; Johan T den Dunnen; Peter E M Taschner
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 2.  High-throughput sequencing technologies.

Authors:  Jason A Reuter; Damek V Spacek; Michael P Snyder
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  A practical guide to filtering and prioritizing genetic variants.

Authors:  Mahjoubeh Jalali Sefid Dashti; Junaid Gamieldien
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.993

4.  Clinical Implementation and Validation of Automated Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) Nomenclature System for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Assays for Cancer.

Authors:  Keith M Callenberg; Lucas Santana-Santos; Liang Chen; Wayne L Ernst; Michelle B De Moura; Yuri E Nikiforov; Marina N Nikiforova; Somak Roy
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 5.  Disease gene identification strategies for exome sequencing.

Authors:  Christian Gilissen; Alexander Hoischen; Han G Brunner; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Enhanced utility of family-centered diagnostic exome sequencing with inheritance model-based analysis: results from 500 unselected families with undiagnosed genetic conditions.

Authors:  Kelly D Farwell; Layla Shahmirzadi; Dima El-Khechen; Zöe Powis; Elizabeth C Chao; Brigette Tippin Davis; Ruth M Baxter; Wenqi Zeng; Cameron Mroske; Melissa C Parra; Stephanie K Gandomi; Ira Lu; Xiang Li; Hong Lu; Hsiao-Mei Lu; David Salvador; David Ruble; Monica Lao; Soren Fischbach; Jennifer Wen; Shela Lee; Aaron Elliott; Charles L M Dunlop; Sha Tang
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Recent developments in genetic/genomic medicine.

Authors:  Rachel H Horton; Anneke M Lucassen
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 6.124

9.  Clinical application of whole-exome sequencing across clinical indications.

Authors:  Kyle Retterer; Jane Juusola; Megan T Cho; Patrik Vitazka; Francisca Millan; Federica Gibellini; Annette Vertino-Bell; Nizar Smaoui; Julie Neidich; Kristin G Monaghan; Dianalee McKnight; Renkui Bai; Sharon Suchy; Bethany Friedman; Jackie Tahiliani; Daniel Pineda-Alvarez; Gabriele Richard; Tracy Brandt; Eden Haverfield; Wendy K Chung; Sherri Bale
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Choice of transcripts and software has a large effect on variant annotation.

Authors:  Davis J McCarthy; Peter Humburg; Alexander Kanapin; Manuel A Rivas; Kyle Gaulton; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.