Literature DB >> 36268087

Empowering digital pathology applications through explainable knowledge extraction tools.

Stefano Marchesin1, Fabio Giachelle1, Niccolò Marini2, Manfredo Atzori2,3, Svetla Boytcheva4, Genziana Buttafuoco5, Francesco Ciompi6, Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio1, Filippo Fraggetta5, Ornella Irrera1, Henning Müller2, Todor Primov4, Simona Vatrano5, Gianmaria Silvello1.   

Abstract

Exa-scale volumes of medical data have been produced for decades. In most cases, the diagnosis is reported in free text, encoding medical knowledge that is still largely unexploited. In order to allow decoding medical knowledge included in reports, we propose an unsupervised knowledge extraction system combining a rule-based expert system with pre-trained Machine Learning (ML) models, namely the Semantic Knowledge Extractor Tool (SKET). Combining rule-based techniques and pre-trained ML models provides high accuracy results for knowledge extraction. This work demonstrates the viability of unsupervised Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to extract critical information from cancer reports, opening opportunities such as data mining for knowledge extraction purposes, precision medicine applications, structured report creation, and multimodal learning. SKET is a practical and unsupervised approach to extracting knowledge from pathology reports, which opens up unprecedented opportunities to exploit textual and multimodal medical information in clinical practice. We also propose SKET eXplained (SKET X), a web-based system providing visual explanations about the algorithmic decisions taken by SKET. SKET X is designed/developed to support pathologists and domain experts in understanding SKET predictions, possibly driving further improvements to the system.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical practice; Digital pathology; Expert systems; Explainable AI; Knowledge extraction; Machine learning

Year:  2022        PMID: 36268087      PMCID: PMC9577130          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol Inform


  34 in total

1.  A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries.

Authors:  W W Chapman; W Bridewell; P Hanbury; G F Cooper; B G Buchanan
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare.

Authors:  Thomas Davenport; Ravi Kalakota
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2019-06

3.  Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Mitko Veta; Paul Johannes van Diest; Bram van Ginneken; Nico Karssemeijer; Geert Litjens; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Meyke Hermsen; Quirine F Manson; Maschenka Balkenhol; Oscar Geessink; Nikolaos Stathonikos; Marcory Crf van Dijk; Peter Bult; Francisco Beca; Andrew H Beck; Dayong Wang; Aditya Khosla; Rishab Gargeya; Humayun Irshad; Aoxiao Zhong; Qi Dou; Quanzheng Li; Hao Chen; Huang-Jing Lin; Pheng-Ann Heng; Christian Haß; Elia Bruni; Quincy Wong; Ugur Halici; Mustafa Ümit Öner; Rengul Cetin-Atalay; Matt Berseth; Vitali Khvatkov; Alexei Vylegzhanin; Oren Kraus; Muhammad Shaban; Nasir Rajpoot; Ruqayya Awan; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Talha Qaiser; Yee-Wah Tsang; David Tellez; Jonas Annuscheit; Peter Hufnagl; Mira Valkonen; Kimmo Kartasalo; Leena Latonen; Pekka Ruusuvuori; Kaisa Liimatainen; Shadi Albarqouni; Bharti Mungal; Ami George; Stefanie Demirci; Nassir Navab; Seiryo Watanabe; Shigeto Seno; Yoichi Takenaka; Hideo Matsuda; Hady Ahmady Phoulady; Vassili Kovalev; Alexander Kalinovsky; Vitali Liauchuk; Gloria Bueno; M Milagro Fernandez-Carrobles; Ismael Serrano; Oscar Deniz; Daniel Racoceanu; Rui Venâncio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images.

Authors:  Gabriele Campanella; Matthew G Hanna; Luke Geneslaw; Allen Miraflor; Vitor Werneck Krauss Silva; Klaus J Busam; Edi Brogi; Victor E Reuter; David S Klimstra; Thomas J Fuchs
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Data-efficient and weakly supervised computational pathology on whole-slide images.

Authors:  Drew F K Williamson; Tiffany Y Chen; Ming Y Lu; Richard J Chen; Matteo Barbieri; Faisal Mahmood
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 25.671

6.  The feasibility of using natural language processing to extract clinical information from breast pathology reports.

Authors:  Julliette M Buckley; Suzanne B Coopey; John Sharko; Fernanda Polubriaginof; Brian Drohan; Ahmet K Belli; Elizabeth M H Kim; Judy E Garber; Barbara L Smith; Michele A Gadd; Michelle C Specht; Constance A Roche; Thomas M Gudewicz; Kevin S Hughes
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-06-30

Review 7.  AI in Health: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Anita Preininger
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2019-08-16

8.  TBGA: a large-scale Gene-Disease Association dataset for Biomedical Relation Extraction.

Authors:  Stefano Marchesin; Gianmaria Silvello
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Machine Learning Methods for Histopathological Image Analysis.

Authors:  Daisuke Komura; Shumpei Ishikawa
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 10.  Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine.

Authors:  Andreas Holzinger; Georg Langs; Helmut Denk; Kurt Zatloukal; Heimo Müller
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov       Date:  2019-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.