Literature DB >> 36268068

Improving unsupervised stain-to-stain translation using self-supervision and meta-learning.

Nassim Bouteldja1,2, Barbara M Klinkhammer2, Tarek Schlaich1, Peter Boor2,3, Dorit Merhof1,4.   

Abstract

Background: In digital pathology, many image analysis tasks are challenged by the need for large and time-consuming manual data annotations to cope with various sources of variability in the image domain. Unsupervised domain adaptation based on image-to-image translation is gaining importance in this field by addressing variabilities without the manual overhead. Here, we tackle the variation of different histological stains by unsupervised stain-to-stain translation to enable a stain-independent applicability of a deep learning segmentation model.
Methods: We use CycleGANs for stain-to-stain translation in kidney histopathology, and propose two novel approaches to improve translational effectivity. First, we integrate a prior segmentation network into the CycleGAN for a self-supervised, application-oriented optimization of translation through semantic guidance, and second, we incorporate extra channels to the translation output to implicitly separate artificial meta-information otherwise encoded for tackling underdetermined reconstructions.
Results: The latter showed partially superior performances to the unmodified CycleGAN, but the former performed best in all stains providing instance-level Dice scores ranging between 78% and 92% for most kidney structures, such as glomeruli, tubules, and veins. However, CycleGANs showed only limited performance in the translation of other structures, e.g. arteries. Our study also found somewhat lower performance for all structures in all stains when compared to segmentation in the original stain. Conclusions: Our study suggests that with current unsupervised technologies, it seems unlikely to produce "generally" applicable simulated stains.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Digital pathology; Domain translation; Kidney; Segmentation; Stain-to-stain translation

Year:  2022        PMID: 36268068      PMCID: PMC9577059          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol Inform


  14 in total

1.  Pathologist workforce in the United States: I. Development of a predictive model to examine factors influencing supply.

Authors:  Stanley J Robboy; Sally Weintraub; Andrew E Horvath; Bradden W Jensen; C Bruce Alexander; Edward P Fody; James M Crawford; Jimmy R Clark; Julie Cantor-Weinberg; Megha G Joshi; Michael B Cohen; Michael B Prystowsky; Sarah M Bean; Saurabh Gupta; Suzanne Z Powell; V O Speights; David J Gross; W Stephen Black-Schaffer
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Deep Adversarial Training for Multi-Organ Nuclei Segmentation in Histopathology Images.

Authors:  Faisal Mahmood; Daniel Borders; Richard J Chen; Gregory N Mckay; Kevan J Salimian; Alexander Baras; Nicholas J Durr
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Generative Adversarial Networks for Facilitating Stain-Independent Supervised and Unsupervised Segmentation: A Study on Kidney Histology.

Authors:  Michael Gadermayr; Laxmi Gupta; Vitus Appel; Peter Boor; Barbara M Klinkhammer; Dorit Merhof
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Virtual histological staining of unlabelled tissue-autofluorescence images via deep learning.

Authors:  Yair Rivenson; Hongda Wang; Zhensong Wei; Kevin de Haan; Yibo Zhang; Yichen Wu; Harun Günaydın; Jonathan E Zuckerman; Thomas Chong; Anthony E Sisk; Lindsey M Westbrook; W Dean Wallace; Aydogan Ozcan
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 5.  Histopathological image analysis: a review.

Authors:  Metin N Gurcan; Laura E Boucheron; Ali Can; Anant Madabhushi; Nasir M Rajpoot; B Yener
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-10-30

6.  Deep Learning-Based Histopathologic Assessment of Kidney Tissue.

Authors:  Meyke Hermsen; Thomas de Bel; Marjolijn den Boer; Eric J Steenbergen; Jesper Kers; Sandrine Florquin; Joris J T H Roelofs; Mark D Stegall; Mariam P Alexander; Byron H Smith; Bart Smeets; Luuk B Hilbrands; Jeroen A W M van der Laak
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis.

Authors:  Peter Bankhead; Maurice B Loughrey; José A Fernández; Yvonne Dombrowski; Darragh G McArt; Philip D Dunne; Stephen McQuaid; Ronan T Gray; Liam J Murray; Helen G Coleman; Jacqueline A James; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Peter W Hamilton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Deep Learning-Based Segmentation and Quantification in Experimental Kidney Histopathology.

Authors:  Nassim Bouteldja; Barbara M Klinkhammer; Roman D Bülow; Patrick Droste; Simon W Otten; Saskia Freifrau von Stillfried; Julia Moellmann; Susan M Sheehan; Ron Korstanje; Sylvia Menzel; Peter Bankhead; Matthias Mietsch; Charis Drummer; Michael Lehrke; Rafael Kramann; Jürgen Floege; Peter Boor; Dorit Merhof
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Development and evaluation of deep learning-based segmentation of histologic structures in the kidney cortex with multiple histologic stains.

Authors:  Catherine P Jayapandian; Yijiang Chen; Andrew R Janowczyk; Matthew B Palmer; Clarissa A Cassol; Miroslav Sekulic; Jeffrey B Hodgin; Jarcy Zee; Stephen M Hewitt; John O'Toole; Paula Toro; John R Sedor; Laura Barisoni; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 10.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.