| Literature DB >> 36268010 |
Emi Irie1, Rino Ishihara1, Ichiro Mizushima1, Shunya Hatai2, Yuya Hagihara1, Yoshiaki Takada1, Junya Tsunoda3, Kentaro Iwata1, Yuta Matsubara1, Yusuke Yoshimatsu1, Hiroki Kiyohara1, Nobuhito Taniki1, Tomohisa Sujino4, Kaoru Takabayashi4, Naoki Hosoe4, Haruhiko Ogata4, Toshiaki Teratani1, Nobuhiro Nakamoto1, Yohei Mikami1, Takanori Kanai1,5.
Abstract
Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) serve as frontline defenses against parasites. However, excluding helminth infections, it is poorly understood how ILC2s function in intestinal inflammation, including inflammatory bowel disease. Here, we analyzed the global gene expression of ILC2s in healthy and colitic conditions and revealed that type I interferon (T1IFN)-stimulated genes were up-regulated in ILC2s in dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis. The enhancement of T1IFN signaling in ILC2s in DSS-induced colitis was correlated with the downregulation of cytokine production by ILC2s, such as interleukin-5. Blocking T1IFN signaling during colitis resulted in exaggeration of colitis in both wild-type and Rag2-deficient mice. The exacerbation of colitis induced by neutralization of T1IFN signaling was accompanied by reduction of amphiregulin (AREG) in ILC2s and was partially rescued by exogenous AREG treatment. Collectively, these findings show the potential roles of T1IFN in ILC2s that contribute to colitis manifestation.Entities:
Keywords: ILC2 - group 2 innate lymphoid cell; colitis; ibd; ifnar; type I interferon
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36268010 PMCID: PMC9578145 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.982827
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1Comparison of ILC2s across digestive organs (A, B) Representative flow cytometry plots (A) and frequencies among CD45+ lymphocytes (B) of Lin−CD127+GATA3+ ILC2s in the colon (LI), small intestine (SI), liver, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) of SPF (specific pathogen free) mice. n=5 for each tissue. Data are representative of two independent experiments (mean and SEM in B). (C–E) ScRNA-seq analysis of colonic CD45+ cells. (C) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) of CD45+ cells (n = 4266) derived from pooled 5 SPF mice, showing the formation of 16 main clusters represented by different colors. The functional description of each cluster is determined by the gene expression characteristics of each. (D) Dot plot visualizing the expression of representative genes of ILC2s. The color represents the average expression level, and the circle size represents the proportion of cells expressing each gene. (E) Expression levels of the specified marker genes on the UMAP plots. ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 2Enhancement of T1IFN signaling in ILC2s in DSS-induced colitis (A, B) WT mice were administered DSS for 7 days. Graphs show pooled data from three independent experiments (n=12 for each group). (A) Change in % body weight relative to initial body weight of control mice (drinking water) and DSS-treated mice in two representative experiments (n=8 for each group). Disease activity index (DAI) score on day 7 and colon length of mice of each group (n=12 for each group). (B) % lymphocyte and absolute number of colonic ILC2s in each group (n=12 for each group). (C) Heatmap showing relative gene expression of highly expressed differentially expressed (DE) genes (max TPM>10, log2FC>1, log2FC<-1) and the number of upregulated (22 genes) and downregulated genes (43 genes) in DSS treated (n=3) compared to that of control mice (n=3). (D) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the DSS-activated genes defined in panel C including names of representative genes. (E) Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) of interferon signaling pathway of genes differentially expressed in DSS-induced colitis. (F) Absolute gene expression (TPM) of Type I IFN related genes. Data are mean and SEM in (A, B, F) ns, not significant; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 3Inhibition of T1IFN signaling exacerbated DSS-induced colitis. WT mice were injected anti-IFN-alpha/beta receptor1 (IFNAR1) antibody intraperitoneally (i.p.) on day 0 and administered DSS (n=4 for each group). (A) Change in % body weight relative to initial body weight of control (DSS treated) mice (n=4) and anti IFNAR1 i.p. injected (DSS treated) mice (n=4). (B) Disease activity index (DAI) score on day 7 and colon length of mice of each group (n=4 for each group). (C, D) Histological score (n=4 for each group) and histopathology of distal colon. (E) Amphiregulin (AREG) expression in ILC2s of control mice and anti-IFNAR1 treated mice. Representative contour plots showing AREG expressing ILC2s in control mice (DSS treated) and anti IFNAR1 i.p. injected mice (DSS treated). Frequency of AREG expressing ILC2s among all ILC2s and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of AREG in ILC2s (n=4 for each group). Data are mean and SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 4Amphiregulin treatment partially rescued severity of DSS-induced colitis in anti-IFNAR treated mice. WT mice were injected exogenous recombinant AREG (rAREG) over the course of DSS exposure with anti-IFNAR1 i.p. injection. Data are representative of two independent experiments (n=6 for control group, n=8 for anti IFNAR1 only and anti IFNAR1 plus rAREG injected group). (A) Change in % body weight relative to initial body weight of control mice (DSS treated) (n=6), anti IFNAR1 i.p. injected mice (DSS treated) (n=8) and anti IFNAR1 plus rAREG i.p. injected mice (DSS treated) (n=8). ** P<0.01 vs anti IFNAR1 group, # P<0.05, ## P<0.01 vs control group. (B) Disease activity index (DAI) score on day 7 and colon length of mice of each group. (C, D) Histological score and histopathology of distal colon. (E) Frequency of IRF7+ ILC2s in each group. Data are mean and SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001.