Literature DB >> 36267473

Role of Pediatric Ureteral Access Sheath and Outcomes Related to Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Stone Fragmentation: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Francesco Ripa1, Theodoros Tokas2,3, Stephen Griffin1, Stefania Ferretti4, Anna Bujons Tur5, Bhaskar K Somani1.   

Abstract

Context: Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURSL) represent a good treatment option for pediatric urolithiasis. Scarce evidence is available about the safety and efficacy of the concomitant use of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) in the setting of pediatric ureteroscopy (URS). Objective: To acquire all the available evidence on UAS usage in pediatric FURSL, focusing on intra- and postoperative complications and stone-free rates (SFRs). Evidence acquisition: We performed a systematic literature research using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases. The inclusion criteria were cohorts of pediatric patients <18 yr old, submitted to URS for FURSL, reporting on more than ten cases of UAS placement. The primary outcomes were prestenting rates, operating time, ureteric stent placement rates after surgery, rates and grades of complications, ureteral injuries, and overall SFR. A total of 22 articles were selected. Evidence synthesis: In total, 26 intraoperative and 130 postoperative complications following URS with UAS placement were reported (1.8% and 9.18% of the overall procedures, respectively). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 32 were classified as Clavien I, 29 as Clavien II, 43 as Clavien I or II, six as Clavien III, and one as Clavien IV. Twenty-one cases of ureteral injuries (1.59%) were noted in the whole cohort; most of them were ureteral perforation or extravasation, and were treated with a temporary indwelling ureteric stent. The overall SFR after a single URS procedure was 76.92%; after at least a second procedure, it was 84.9%. Conclusions: FURSL is a safe and effective treatment option for pediatric urolithiasis. UAS use was associated with a low rate of ureteric injuries, mostly treated and resolved with a temporary indwelling ureteric stent. Patient summary: We performed a systematic literature research on the utilization of a UAS during ureteroscopy for stone treatment in pediatric patients. We assessed the outcomes related to the rates of intra- and postoperative complications and the rates of efficacy of the procedure in the clearance of stones. The evidence shows a low rate and grade of complications associated with UAS placement and good stone-free outcomes. A ureteric injury may occur in 1.6% of cases, but it is usually managed and resolved with a temporary indwelling ureteric stent.
© 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access sheath; Kidney calculi; Laser; Pediatric; Ureteral access sheath; Ureteroscopy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36267473      PMCID: PMC9576810          DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci        ISSN: 2666-1683


  52 in total

1.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones in children: factors influencing stone clearance and complications.

Authors:  Mujdem Nur Azili; Fatma Ozcan; Tugrul Tiryaki
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Could surgical experience of adult endourologist overcome the learning curve of retrograde intrarenal surgery in children?

Authors:  Simone Sforza; Agostino Tuccio; Antonio Andrea Grosso; Alfonso Crisci; Chiara Cini; Lorenzo Masieri
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Eyup Burak Sancak; Mustafa Resorlu; Murat Tolga Gulpinar; Gurhan Adam; Alpaslan Akbas; Huseyin Ozdemir
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06

4.  Outcomes and lessons learnt from practice of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in a paediatric setting of various age groups: a global study across 8 centres.

Authors:  Ee Jean Lim; Olivier Traxer; Yesica Quiroz Madarriaga; Daniele Castellani; Khi Yung Fong; Vinson Wai-Shun Chan; Anna Bujons Tur; Amelia Pietropaolo; Deepak Ragoori; Anil Shrestha; Chandra Mohan Vaddi; Tanuj Paul Bhatia; Mriganka Mani; Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Stephen Griffin; Esther García Rojo; Mariela Corrales; Cagri Akin Sekerci; Yiloren Tanidir; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Vineet Gauhar; Bhaskar Kumar Somani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Is ureteroscopy first line treatment for pediatric stone disease?

Authors:  Marc C Smaldone; Glenn M Cannon; Hsi-Yang Wu; Jeffrey Bassett; Ethan G Polsky; Mark F Bellinger; Steven G Docimo; Francis X Schneck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Olivier Traxer; Alexandre Thomas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Ureteral access sheath for the management of pediatric renal and ureteral stones: a single center experience.

Authors:  Amar Singh; Gaurang Shah; Jennifer Young; Maryellen Sheridan; Gabriel Haas; Jyoti Upadhyay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones in children <5 years of age.

Authors:  Vaddi Chandramohan; P M Siddalingaswamy; Paidakula Ramakrishna; Ganesan Soundarya; Babu Manas; Anandan Hemnath
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2021-01-01

9.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Controversies in ureteroscopy: Wire, basket, and sheath.

Authors:  Emad R Rizkala; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.