| Literature DB >> 36267465 |
Cong Pang1, Zheng Peng1, Xiaojian Li1, Yongyue Gao1, Xunzhi Liu1, Han Wang1, Yue Lu1, Zong Zhuang1, Qingrong Zhang1, Wei Li1, Chunhua Hang1.
Abstract
Background: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) can impair blood perfusion in brain tissue and cause adverse effects. Microglia, which are the inherent immune cells of the brain, significantly activate and play a role in phagocytosis, anti-inflammatory, proinflammatory, and damage repair in this process. Milk fat globule epidermal growth factor 8 (MFG-E8) is the bridging molecule of this process and mediates the activation and biological effects of microglia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36267465 PMCID: PMC9578862 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6731286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.464
The health status of the patients in the experimental cohort.
| Patient injury status | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Gender | Age | Aneurysm location | Hunt-Hess | Admission GCS score | Admission GOS score |
| 1 | Male | 42 | V4 segment of left vertebral artery | II | 13 | 3 |
| 2 | Female | 57 | Anterior communicating artery | II | 15 | 3 |
| 3 | Female | 57 | Right posterior communicating artery | II | 13 | 3 |
| 4 | Male | 49 | The bifurcation of right middle cerebral artery | I | 15 | 4 |
| 5 | Female | 51 | Anterior communicating artery | II | 10 | 3 |
| 6 | Female | 76 | Anterior communicating artery | I | 15 | 4 |
| 7 | Female | 46 | Posterior communicating artery | II | 12 | 3 |
| 8 | Female | 48 | Apex of basilar artery | II | 15 | 3 |
| 9 | Female | 65 | Left anterior choroidal artery | I | 15 | 4 |
| 10 | Male | 52 | The bifurcation of middle cerebral artery | I | 15 | 4 |
| 11 | Female | 65 | Left posterior communicating artery | I | 15 | 5 |
| 12 | Female | 49 | Right posterior communicating artery | I | 13 | 4 |
| 13 | Male | 68 | Right anterior choroidal artery | II | 13 | 3 |
| 14 | Female | 45 | Apex of basilar artery | I | 15 | 4 |
The GOS scores of all patients at different times.
| GOS scores of patients at different times | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Admission GOS score | Day 3 GOS | Day 7 GOS | Day 9 GOS | GOS at discharge |
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 10 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| 11 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 13 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Figure 1The relationship between MFG-E8 and changes in GOS. (a) The difference in MFG-E8 levels between cohort 1 and cohort 2 (cohort 1: GOS with elevation on day 7 in contrast with admission and cohort 2: GOS with no elevation on day 7 in contrast with admission). (b) The difference in MFG-E8 levels between cohort 3 and cohort 4 (cohort 3: GOS with elevation on day 9 compared with admission and cohort 4: GOS with no elevation on day 9 compared with admission). (c–f) The correlation between the levels of MFG-E8 on day 3 and the alterations in GOS scores at distinct times following aSAH. ∗p < 0.05 between cohorts.
The GCS scores of all patients at different times.
| GCS scores of patients at different times | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Admission GCS score | Day 3 GCS | Day 7 GCS | Day 9 GCS | GCS at discharge |
| 1 | 13 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 2 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 3 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 4 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 5 | 10 | 12 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 6 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 7 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 8 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 9 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 10 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 11 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 12 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 13 | 13 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| 14 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
Figure 2Changes in MFG-E8 levels in CSF measured by ELISA. The MFG-E8 protein levels at different times after aSAH and in the control cohort. ∗p < 0.05 compared with the control cohort; #p < 0.05 compared with the day 3 cohort.
Figure 3The link between MFG-E8 and the changes of GCS. (a) The association between MFG-E8 levels and changes in GCS on the third day. (b) The association between MFG-E8 levels and alterations in GCS on the seventh day.