Literature DB >> 36267355

Welcome back Kotter-Developing a National Allergy strategy for Australia.

Sandra L Vale1,2,3,4, Maria Said1,2,3,4, Jill Smith2, Preeti Joshi1,2,5, Richard Ks Loh2,4,6.   

Abstract

Background: Allergic diseases have become an increasing health issue worldwide, being one of the fastest growing chronic diseases in Australia and other westernized countries. In 2013, allergic diseases were reported to affect 20% of the Australian population. Despite the high prevalence there was no national strategy to address these complex health issues, to enable the health system to manage the increasing number of patients. This project aimed to develop and implement a national strategy to improve allergy management in Australia, with a view of improving the quality of life of people living with or caring for someone with allergic diseases.
Methods: The need for a national strategy to improve allergy management was identified. The Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA) and Allergy & Anaphylaxis Australia (A&AA) worked together as partners to progress a national strategy using a theoretical model to underpin its development. Unrestricted education grants were sought to fund engagement with stakeholder organizations for both development and implementation summits. Several stages of advocacy were undertaken.
Results: The National Allergy Strategy was developed as a partnership between ASCIA and A&AA. The Kotter's Change Management Model provided the basis for the steps undertaken to develop and implement the National Allergy Strategy. Two Allergy Summits, one for development and the other for implementation, were held. Several events were held to advocate for federal government funding. Five individual funding grants were achieved to implement National Allergy Strategy projects addressing the most urgent issues.
Conclusion: The development of the National Allergy Strategy, a partnership between ASCIA and A&AA, was important in enabling successful advocacy for funding and implementation of important Australia-wide projects. The partnership has also helped facilitate engagement with key stakeholders to help advocate for funding and provide guidance and expertise in project implementation and resource development. The National Allergy Strategy has been successful in attracting funding to implement projects and develop resources urgently needed. The National Allergy Strategy has also provided a framework and a collaborative approach, for advocacy for further funding and future work to be undertaken.
© 2022 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advocacy; Allergy; Funding; Implementation; Kotter's Change Model; National Allergy Strategy; Partnership; Strategy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36267355      PMCID: PMC9574709          DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Allergy Organ J        ISSN: 1939-4551            Impact factor:   5.516


  21 in total

1.  Time trends in Australian hospital anaphylaxis admissions in 1998-1999 to 2011-2012.

Authors:  Raymond James Mullins; Keith B G Dear; Mimi L K Tang
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 10.793

2.  Not just 'for' but 'with': health advocacy as a partnership process.

Authors:  Maria Hubinette; Sarah Dobson; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 3.  Finnish Allergy Programme 2008-2018--time to act and change the course.

Authors:  T Haahtela; L von Hertzen; M Mäkelä; M Hannuksela
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 13.146

Review 4.  How to prevent food allergy during infancy: what has changed since 2013?

Authors:  William J Lavery; Amal Assa'ad
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2018-06

5.  Anaphylaxis fatalities and admissions in Australia.

Authors:  Woei Kang Liew; Elizabeth Williamson; Mimi L K Tang
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 6.  The atopic march: Critical evidence and clinical relevance.

Authors:  David A Hill; Jonathan M Spergel
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.347

7.  Randomized trial of peanut consumption in infants at risk for peanut allergy.

Authors:  George Du Toit; Graham Roberts; Peter H Sayre; Henry T Bahnson; Suzana Radulovic; Alexandra F Santos; Helen A Brough; Deborah Phippard; Monica Basting; Mary Feeney; Victor Turcanu; Michelle L Sever; Margarita Gomez Lorenzo; Marshall Plaut; Gideon Lack
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Enquiring About Tolerance (EAT) study: Feasibility of an early allergenic food introduction regimen.

Authors:  Michael R Perkin; Kirsty Logan; Tom Marrs; Suzana Radulovic; Joanna Craven; Carsten Flohr; Gideon Lack
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model.

Authors:  Katherine Cullerton; Timothy Donnet; Amanda Lee; Danielle Gallegos
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Randomized Trial of Introduction of Allergenic Foods in Breast-Fed Infants.

Authors:  Michael R Perkin; Kirsty Logan; Anna Tseng; Bunmi Raji; Salma Ayis; Janet Peacock; Helen Brough; Tom Marrs; Suzana Radulovic; Joanna Craven; Carsten Flohr; Gideon Lack
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.