Literature DB >> 36267199

Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication-intervention events-Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study.

Christopher Soliman1, Benjamin C Thomas1, Pasqualina Santaguida2, Nathan Lawrentschuk1, Evie Mertens1, Gianluca Giannarini3, Patrick Y Wuethrich4, Michael Wu1, Muhammad S Khan5, Rajesh Nair5, Ramesh Thurairaja5, Benjamin Challacombe5, Prokar Dasgupta5, Sachin Malde5, Niall M Corcoran1,6, Philippe E Spiess7, Philip Dundee1, Marc A Furrer1,5,8.   

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to gain experienced nursing perspective on current and future complication reporting and grading in Urology, establish the CAMUS CCI and quality control the use of the Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC) in nursing staff. Subjects and
Methods: The 12-part REDCap-based Delphi survey was developed in conjunction with expert nurse, urologist and methodologist input. Certified local and international inpatient and outpatient nurses specialised in urology, perioperative nurses and urology-specific advanced practice nurses/nurse practitioners will be included. A minimum sample size of 250 participants is targeted. The survey assesses participant demographics, nursing experience and opinion on complication reporting and the proposed CAMUS reporting recommendations; grading of intervention events using the existing CDC and the proposed CAMUS Classification; and rating various clinical scenarios. Consensus will be defined as ≥75% agreement. If consensus is not reached, subsequent Delphi rounds will be performed under Steering Committee guidance.
Results: Twenty participants completed the pilot survey. Median survey completion time was 58 min (IQR 40-67). The survey revealed that 85% of nursing participants believe nurses should be involved in future complication reporting and grading but currently have poor confidence and inadequate relevant background education. Overall, 100% of participants recognise the universal demand for reporting consensus and 75% hold a preference towards the CAMUS System. Limitations include variability in nursing experience, complexity of supplemental grades and survey duration.
Conclusion: The integration of experienced nursing opinion and participation in complication reporting and grading systems in a modern and evolving hospital infrastructure may facilitate the assimilation of otherwise overlooked safety data. Incorporation of focused teaching into routine nursing education will be essential to ensure quality control and stimulate awareness of complication-related burden. This, in turn, has the potential to improve patient counselling and quality of care.
© 2022 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delphi method; complication grading; complication reporting; consensus paper; urological surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 36267199      PMCID: PMC9579890          DOI: 10.1002/bco2.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJUI Compass        ISSN: 2688-4526


  31 in total

Review 1.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.

Authors:  F Hasson; S Keeney; H McKenna
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Classification and analysis of incidents in complex medical environments.

Authors:  D K Busse; D J Wright
Journal:  Top Health Inf Manage       Date:  2000-05

3.  Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations.

Authors:  Dionysios Mitropoulos; Walter Artibani; Markus Graefen; Mesut Remzi; Morgan Rouprêt; Michael Truss
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Review of the Australian incident monitoring system.

Authors:  Allan D Spigelman; Judith Swan
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.872

5.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study.

Authors:  S M Evans; J G Berry; B J Smith; A Esterman; P Selim; J O'Shaughnessy; M DeWit
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-02

7.  The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992.

Authors:  A A Gawande; E J Thomas; M J Zinner; T A Brennan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Protocol for CAMUS Delphi Study: A Consensus on Comprehensive Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urological Surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Soliman; Clancy J Mulholland; Pasqualina Santaguida; Niranjan J Sathianathen; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Gianluca Giannarini; Patrick Y Wuethrich; Lukas M Loeffel; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Henry Y C Pan; Rajesh Nair; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Bernhard Riedel; Benjamin C Thomas; Jamie Kearsley; Niall Corcoran; Philip Dundee; Marc A Furrer
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2022-02-24

9.  Re: Impact of the Implementation of the EAU Guidelines Recommendation on Reporting and Grading of Complications in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Niranjan J Sathianathen; Nathan Lawrentschuk; George N Thalmann; Marc A Furrer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  How to undertake effective record-keeping and documentation.

Authors:  Nicola Brooks
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2021-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.