| Literature DB >> 36267086 |
Jie Cheng1, Xinyi Wang2, Leisheng Wang2, Yufei Zhang2, Yu Gu1, Dan Mao1, Xingyu Zhou1, Xiaolong Wang1, Yuansheng Tian2.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of different acupuncture points in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis with supervised moxibustion.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36267086 PMCID: PMC9578832 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4688689
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Figure 1Schematic diagram of supervisor moxibustion method.
Comparison of general conditions of patients.
| Grouping | Number of cases | Age ( | Gender | The course of disease ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||
| Treatment | 30 | 39.93 ± 10.52 | 20 | 10 | 4.77 ± 3.06 |
| Control | 31 | 40.06 ± 10.64 | 23 | 8 | 6.16 ± 2.88 |
Comparison of curative effects of patients (cases).
| Group |
| Recovery | Remarkable effect | Valid | Invalid | Efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 30 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 4 | 86.7 |
| Control | 31 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 5 | 83.9 |
Comparison of quantitative scores of main symptoms of patients ().
| Group |
| Before treatment | After treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 30 | 26.95 ± 3.90 | 11.2 ± 4.21 |
| Control | 31 | 25.05 ± 3.37 | 13.62 ± 3.68 |
|
| 1.085 | 2.593 | |
|
| 0.304 | 0.02 |
Comparison of thoracic range of motion ().
| Group |
| Before treatment | After treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 30 | 2.48 ± 0.86 | 4.18 ± 1.51 |
| Control | 31 | 1.95 ± 0.79 | 2.5 ± 0.96 |
|
| 1.162 | 5.821 | |
|
| 0.285 | 0.019 |
Comparison of occipital-wall distance ().
| Group |
| Before treatment | After treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 30 | 6.886.27 | 3.09 ± 4.67 |
| Control | 31 | 5.27 ± 4.13 | 4.02 ± 3.94 |
|
| 1.483 | 1.982 | |
|
| 0.226 | 0.049 |
Comparison of the finger-ground distance ().
| Group |
| Before treatment | After treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 30 | 23.44 ± 10.86 | 15.95 ± 8.44 |
| Control | 31 | 24.92 ± 14.02 | 19.18 ± 12.35 |
|
| 1.482 | 5.765 | |
|
| 0.227 | 0.022 |
Comparison of ESR ().
| Group |
| Before treatment | After treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 30 | 14.05 ± 10.53 | 8.79 ± 7.68 |
| Control | 31 | 20.86 ± 20.32 | 12.86 ± 16.05 |
|
| 0.754 | 9.613 | |
|
| 0.454 | 0.005 |