Literature DB >> 36266529

Evaluation of the microperimetry in eyes with cuticular drusen.

Seung Wan Nam1, Jung Hwa Lee2, Zeeyoon Byun2, Don-Il Ham1, Mingui Kong3,4.   

Abstract

Retinal sensitivity may vary by subtypes of cuticular drusen. This retrospective study included 52 eyes of 32 patients with cuticular drusen. All the patients underwent assessment of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluorescence, and microperimetry. The area occupied by drusen was counted using microperimetry. The cuticular drusen subtype was classified into 3 groups based on the SD-OCT findings. Age, BCVA, pattern standard deviation, area occupied by drusen, pupil size, and the false-positive rate were not significantly different (p > 0.05) according to the cuticular drusen type. The mean retinal sensitivity (MRS) (p = 0.063) and mean deviation (MD) (p = 0.098) showed marginally significant differences among the groups. In the subgroup analyses, type 1 and type 3 cuticular drusen showed significant differences in the MD (- 1.8 ± 2.1 vs - 5.1 ± 5.3; p = 0.011) and MRS (25.1 ± 2.2 vs 21.3 ± 5.7; p = 0.016) without differences in age, BCVA, or the area occupied by drusen (p > 0.05). The results indicate that depending on the subtypes of cuticular drusen type, the deterioration of retinal sensitivity is more likely to occur than decreased vision.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36266529      PMCID: PMC9584893          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22513-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  25 in total

1.  Relationship between retinal sensitivity and morphologic changes in eyes with confluent soft drusen.

Authors:  Daisuke Iwama; Akitaka Tsujikawa; Yumiko Ojima; Hideo Nakanishi; Kenji Yamashiro; Hiroshi Tamura; Sotaro Ooto; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 4.207

2.  Aging and scotopic sensitivity.

Authors:  G R Jackson; C Owsley; E P Cordle; C D Finley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.

Authors:  Giovanni Montesano; Susan R Bryan; David P Crabb; Paolo Fogagnolo; Francesco Oddone; Allison M McKendrick; Andrew Turpin; Paolo Lanzetta; Andrea Perdicchi; Chris A Johnson; David F Garway-Heath; Paolo Brusini; Luca M Rossetti
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Adult vitelliform macular detachment occurring in patients with basal laminar drusen.

Authors:  J D Gass; S Jallow; B Davis
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Reticular pseudodrusen are subretinal drusenoid deposits.

Authors:  Sandrine A Zweifel; Richard F Spaide; Christine A Curcio; Goldis Malek; Yutaka Imamura
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Cuticular Drusen: Clinical Phenotypes and Natural History Defined Using Multimodal Imaging.

Authors:  Chandrakumar Balaratnasingam; Svetlana Cherepanoff; Rosa Dolz-Marco; Murray Killingsworth; Fred K Chen; Randev Mendis; Sarah Mrejen; Lay Khoon Too; Orly Gal-Or; Christine A Curcio; K Bailey Freund; Lawrence A Yannuzzi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Electrophysiological function in eyes with reticular pseudodrusen according to fundus distribution.

Authors:  Mingui Kong; Jaemoon Yoon; Don-Il Ham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Clinical manifestations of cuticular drusen in Korean patients.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Shin; Mingui Kong; Gyule Han; Jong Chul Han; Don-Il Ham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Soft Drusen in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Biology and Targeting Via the Oil Spill Strategies.

Authors:  Christine A Curcio
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.